No Child Left Behind -- A Utopian Dream

President Bush is intent on seeing the NCL law reauthorized. It is a wonderful, Utopian, dream to have 100% proficiency among students. Wouldn't it be wonderful if every child were to be able to do grade level work. The only problem is that reality and dreams don't always coincide.
That there are aspects of the education system that need to be reformed and improved is obvious, but putting unachievable burdens on schools and then punishing them if they fail, is simply silly and unconscionable. I've long believed that NCL was an attempt to discredit the public school system and provide the foundation for a vouchers law. The reality is, that public schools are the foundation of our society, and by law they are required to take in every child. A private school can be selective. It can refuse to admit children who are disabled or intellectually challenged, simply on the basis that they are unprepared to make provision for these children. By requiring everyone to be at the same level fails to take into consideration that some children/some people will never be up to grade level standards. Intellectually they simply are unable to do so. To punish schools for this is ridiculous.
And then there's the student's responsibility. As they say, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. The same is true of students and learning. And then there's the whole issue of test taking. Some kids do great at it, and others freeze up. By simply basing everything on tests, we have forced teachers to teach to the test in the hope of retaining jobs and more.
So, if we reauthorize the NCL law let's move from utopia to reality! I want to see every child succeed, but there is more than one way to define success. As a Christian, I believe in grace. A system that is without grace is, in my mind, immoral, and NCL is a system without grace.

Comments

Mike L. said…
I agree. The motivation to improve education behind this law is good, but the law itself and the execution of the law is horrible. My wife teaches special Education in a public middle school and this year has been hell for her. The main reason is that she has to figure out how to satisfy the law that states her kids must be taught grade level appropriate material. This means she teaches algebra and science to kids that often can't read, speak in full sentences, or tie their own shoes. How horrible is that? Meanwhile the kids don't get enough time learning life skills that could help them survive. I would have told the administration to kiss my ass but my wife has much more patience than I do.
Robert Cornwall said…
Thanks Mike,

This is exactly what I mean. Children are in special education for a reason. To expect them all to do algebra and science is simply ridiculous and unfair to them. I commend your wife for her patience but she shouldn't be in this situation!
Anonymous said…
Amen twice over both to your posting and to the comment. Unfortunately, the situation is almost as bad in a "regular" classroom. Confronted with 30-35 students, at least half come to you below grade level already, & I never could see how you can build the fifth floor without the second, third, & fourth. Add to that that in California, at least, only 3% are supposed to be in any type of special ed, and that a child retained in kindergarten can not be retained again. If you have any paid help, that often is an hour or less per day. And volunteer help is often less than reliable.
No wonder I retired early.

Popular Posts