The Meanness of Politics

There is a reason so many people avoid politics. It seems to suck from us our civility and sense of dignity. At some point it seems that to succeed we must become “mean.” It’s the reason why mud is so often thrown, for to succeed one must tear down the other. In the end we vote for the one left standing. That seems to be the kind of meanness found on the Democratic side of the ledger. Most recently we’ve seen Hillary Clinton turn in that direction as her lead has shrunk and she feels the heat in Iowa. The question everyone asks is whether getting mean will help or hinder.

On the GOP side, with the interesting exception of Mike Huckabee, the candidates seem to be running on a platform of who can be the meanest. We have Rudy and Fred, both of whom seem stern and aloof. And with Rudy especially, the sense of “mean” stands out. Mitt doesn’t do mean as well, but with his lead in Iowa slipping he must show his “masculinity” as well. Torture is one issue where that “meanness” can be expressed. Immigration is another.

I think we need to ask ourselves why meanness sells – on either side of the aisle. I do think it fires up the “base.” Political base, of course, but instincts as well.

For people of faith who seek to involve ourselves in the political process we need to watch our tone, our language, our intent. There is a fine line it seems between assertiveness and aggression; passion and anger. As we choose candidates, who do we want representing us to the world?
Cross published at Faithfully Liberal

Comments

Popular Posts