I Ain’t Gonna Study War No More
I ain't gonna study
war no more
Study war no more
Ain't gonna study war no more
I will
begin by acknowledging that I am not a pacifist. There are times and places
where armed resistance to tyranny is necessary. But war should be rare. Our
goal should be to move toward a time, as Isaiah prophesied concerning the
judgment of God concerning the nations, a passage that is reflected in the chorus
of the spiritual above:
That is the hope that should guide us as we navigate our
times.
I open
with this reflection on God’s vision of a time when nations will not lift sword
against nations, and when there will no longer be a need to study war, because
the President of the United States and the Secretary of Defense are seeking to
change the name of the Department of Defense back to the War Department. Whether
they can do this is uncertain since the cabinet office was created by Congress
in 1947. Part of the creation of the Department of Defense after World War II
involved splitting off the Air Force from the Army and merging the Navy
Department with the War Department, that is, the Army. But all of that is
technical stuff that neither President Trump nor Secretary Hegseth seems to
care about.
So, why
am I writing this today? I am suspicious of motivations. Pete Hegseth does seem
to value a “warrior spirit.” He constantly speaks of lethality and
war-fighting, as if that is all the military does. As for President Trump, it
appears that he thinks the term “defense” is a sign of weakness. Trump
declared: “It used to be called the Department of War, and it had a stronger
sound.” Returning to the War Department will signal that we are ready to go on
offense. In arguing for the name change,
he declared, “Defense is too defensive.
We want to be defensive, but we want to be offensive, too.”
With
all of this saber-rattling from a President who ran on a claim that he would
keep us out of foreign wars, what are his intentions? Is he thinking of going
on “offense” and invading other nations? He keeps on talking about annexing
Canada, Greenland, the Panama Canal, and even the Gaza Strip. Are invasions of
these places on the table? It seems that at least with Greenland and Panama,
it is possible. Then there is the naval buildup around Venezuela, which
included blowing up a boat allegedly carrying narco-terrorists. Normally, the
Coast Guard would interdict something like this, but we seem to be flexing our
muscles there.
President
Truman and Congress chose the name Department of Defense for a reason. And it
hasn’t stopped us from getting involved in wars. We’ve gone to Korea, Vietnam,
Laos, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Iraq, the Balkans, and don’t forget the invasion
of Grenada. Perhaps the fact that none of these conflicts, besides perhaps Grenada,
ended in absolute victory has Trump and Hegseth feeling the need to flex
muscles and blow up a few countries, especially after the bombing of nuclear
sites in Iran seems to have been less than successful. As I listen to the
bluster from Hegseth and Trump, what I hear is the sound of bullies feeling the
need to beat up on some weaker folks. So, the question is, is this what the
United States stands for? Where we once claimed to stand on the side of the
defenseless, now we seem to be making a very different claim, especially in
light of the excising of those forms of soft power that include feeding the
hungry and caring for the sick.
Comments