What is Liberation Theology?

I can't give you a complete answer to this question in this posting, but I think it's an important question to be raised.  Since Glenn Beck, who is himself a Mormon (and perhaps not the best informed one at that) and not a trained theologian (his post HS education consists of one religion class at Yale), has declared that Barack Obama is captive to "liberation theology," which is all about "victims/oppressors" and condemned by the Pope, "liberation theology" is back in the news.

I think it's important to note that there is not just one liberation theology.  There are many -- Latin-American, Black, Feminist, Asian, Palestinian, and more.  Aspects of liberation theology have always been with us, throughout history, for it is a theology that seeks to transform the world.  This is something that those in power do not like.  It is interesting that the Pope's condemnation of this theology has been brought into the discussion, for the reason why John Paul II and his successor have condemned this theology is because it challenges their power.  It includes a call for the church to be returned to the people.   Luther also got into trouble with the Pope over this issue -- of course, when the Peasants rose up against their oppressors, Luther sided with the authorities and supported the slaughter of people who thought he was on their side.  But all of this is simply a way to get us to a definition (and those can be many).

I simply want to start the discussion by turning to Gustavo Gutierrez, a Peruvian Catholic Theologian, whose book A Theology of Liberation, is considered to be the classic statement on liberation theology.  The quotation I'm about to give comes from 1973 edition.

It is for all these reasons that the theology of liberation offers us not so much a new theme for reflection as a new way to do theology.  Theology as a critical reflection on historical praxis is a liberating theology, a theology of the liberating transformation of mankind and also therefore that part of mankind--gathered into ecclesia -- which openly confesses Christ.  This is a theology which does not stop with reflecting on the world, but rather tries to be part of the process through which the world is transformed.  It is a theology which is open -- in the protest against trampled human dignity, in the struggle against the plunder of the vast majority of people, in liberating love, and in the building of a new, just, and fraternal society  -- to the gift of the Kingdom of God.  (p. 15)  
Glen Beck says that Jesus just came to save our souls, nothing more, nothing less.  That may be the message of the Book of Mormon (I've not read it, so I don't know), but its not the message of the Gospel.  Jesus consistently talks about living a new way of life that transforms the world in which we live.  Evangelism is more than simply rescuing the perishing, it is offering a vision of a new way of living, which Jesus calls the Kingdom of God.  Liberation Theology was born in Latin America out of frustration with a church that turned a blind eye to the abuses perpetrated against the people by dictatorships and a small cadre of wealthy land owners.  When Archbishop Oscar Romero of El Salvador realized what was happening to his people, he woke up to his responsibility and began to speak in opposition.  As a result, death squads aligned with the government (a US supported government) murdered him as he said Mass.  This is what Liberation Theology is all about.  It involves speaking up for those who are voiceless, with a view to a new world of peace and justice.  It is a theology more focused on "orthopraxis" (right living/practice) than "orthodoxy" (right doctrine).  Indeed, I do believe that at its heart is the dictum -- love God and love your neighbor.


Glenn said…
In the Bible, liberation theologists are called prophets and the Son of God. In the American political arena they're called racists and communists.
Brian said…
What I find most helpful about a liberation perspective on the Gospel is the idea that we listen first to those on the "bottom" or margins.

In fact, I'll share my spin on part of your post.

Bob wrote, "This is what Liberation Theology is all about. It involves speaking up for those who are voiceles...".

I agree, but my emphasis is on listening. We give a voice to the voiceless instead of being their voice. We empower them. (Think community organizing as a model.) This is why I think listening is the most profound prophetic act that we (especially middle class white folks)can do in this age. I don't think it takes much courage to speak out. It does, however, take courage to go to the places where the "bottom" are and listen.

Glenn, you put the fun in fundamentalism.
Brian said…

Many here are Disciples of Christ. One of our own, Carmelo Alvarez, is as fine of a liberation theologian as you will find. He's also a kind and gentle soul. Above is info on him.

You are quite right -- liberation theologians are not merely the voices of the voiceless, but they help the voiceless find their voice. That is why they are so controversial.
Brian said…
Glenn - I made a mistake. I was planning on my dumb little "fun in fundamentalism" joke for Gary's next response. I got carried away and mistook you for Gary. This may well count as the unpardonable sin.
David Mc said…
We love Gary. Be nice. I agree, to speak for the oppressed can't be too liberating for them, and we're bound to get it wrong in the translation.
David Mc said…
Speaking of Gary, I was getting a bit worried. I see he's "okay" though.

Anonymous said…
Good for them.

"They found the teens and cornered them for half an hour until police arrived to arrest them."

Glenn said…
No problem Brian. I was wondering how that post colored me as a fundamentalist.

Popular posts from this blog

Standing Firm -- a Palm Sunday Sermon

The Joy of Forgiveness -- A Sermon for Lent 4C (Psalm 32)

Thirsting for God -- Sermon for Lent 3C (Psalm 63)