The Lord Will Provide—Lectionary Reflection for Pentecost 5A/Proper 8 (Genesis 22)
Genesis 22:1-14 New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition
22 After these things God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” 2 He said, “Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains that I shall show you.” 3 So Abraham rose early in the morning, saddled his donkey, and took two of his young men with him and his son Isaac; he cut the wood for the burnt offering and set out and went to the place in the distance that God had shown him. 4 On the third day Abraham looked up and saw the place far away. 5 Then Abraham said to his young men, “Stay here with the donkey; the boy and I will go over there; we will worship, and then we will come back to you.” 6 Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering and laid it on his son Isaac, and he himself carried the fire and the knife. And the two of them walked on together. 7 Isaac said to his father Abraham, “Father!” And he said, “Here I am, my son.” He said, “The fire and the wood are here, but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?” 8 Abraham said, “God himself will provide the lamb for a burnt offering, my son.” And the two of them walked on together.
9 When they came to the place that God had shown him, Abraham built an altar there and laid the wood in order. He bound his son Isaac and laid him on the altar on top of the wood. 10 Then Abraham reached out his hand and took the knife to kill his son. 11 But the angel of the Lord called to him from heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” 12 He said, “Do not lay your hand on the boy or do anything to him, for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me.” 13 And Abraham looked up and saw a ram, caught in a thicket by its horns. Abraham went and took the ram and offered it up as a burnt offering instead of his son. 14 So Abraham called that place “The Lord will provide,” as it is said to this day, “On the mount of the Lord it shall be provided.”
**************
There
are few turning points in the biblical story quite like the offering of Isaac,
what Jews call the Akedah, or the binding of Isaac. The story of
Abraham and Sarah is one of promise. They followed God’s lead and left their
homeland for an unknown location. They were migrants, nomads, who went forth
from Haran with nothing more than a promise that God would make of Abraham a
great nation, through whose descendants the nations would be blessed (Gen.12:1-4). The challenging part of this promise wasn’t the move but the
descendants, as Abraham and Sarah were childless. They lived in hope that one
day the promise of descendants would be fulfilled, even though they grew ever
older. At one point, Sarah provided Abraham and God with an alternative means
to fulfill the practice. That alternative involved offering Hagar, Sarah’s
Egyptian servant, to Abraham as a surrogate. While Sarah couldn’t conceive,
Hagar did provide Abraham with a son and heir—Ishmael (Gen. 16). Apparently that wasn’t what God intended,
so finally the promised child arrives (Gen. 21:1-7) and Sarah chases away
Ishmael and Hagar so there would no longer be rival. Fortunately, according to
the Genesis account, God was with Ishmael, and he survived his banishment (Gen.
21:8-21).
Our
story begins after the birth of Isaac and the banishment of Ishmael. Here is
the promised one, the child whom Abraham and Sarah had waited a lifetime.
Though they had long ago given up hope that Sarah would provide a son, that’s
what happened. What could go wrong? Surely God wouldn’t demand the sacrifice of
this promised child? After all, God had already acceded to Sarah’s request that
Abraham get rid of Ishmael, the first-born son. Now, it’s true that human
sacrifice was a thing, but Isaac was the child of promise. If he were killed
there would be no promise. So, surely Abraham would recoil at such a
suggestion. Yet here in Genesis 22, we’re told that God tested Abraham. By this
point in the story, Abraham knows God’s voice. So when God calls for him, he
answers “Here I am.” Then God makes the unthinkable request. “Take your son,
your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and
offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will show you”
(Gen. 22:1-2). If God requested this of you, what would you do?
If I
were in Abraham’s shoes, I’m not sure I would do as God requested. He had
already sent away Ishmael, and it seems as if Abraham loved him. Now, his
secondborn, the only remaining child, the child of promise, is being requested
by God as a burnt offering. How could God do such a thing? How could Abraham
give in? These are the perennial questions raised by this passage.
According
to our reading, Abraham got up early the next morning, saddled his donkey, took
two young men along with Isaac, and headed out on a journey. He took with him
wood for the fire, but no offering. When the party drew close to the place of
sacrifice, Abraham asked the two young men to stay behind with the donkey as
Abraham and Isaac continued on with their journey. Not only did Abraham take
Isaac with him, but he put the wood for the fire on Isaac. Yes, Isaac is going
to carry the very wood that Abraham will offer him up as a burnt offering to
God. To this point, young Isaac (we might think of him as being around the age
of twelve) didn’t question his father (who carried the knife), but questions
had to be swirling in his mind. They had headed off to offer a sacrifice to
God. They had wood and a knife, but no lamb to offer. Where was that lamb going
to come from? Finally, Isaac does ask the question that is on our minds as
well. He points out the basic facts. They had wood for a fire and a knife, but
where was the lamb? All Abraham could do was tell his beloved son: “God himself
will provide the lamb for a burnt offering” (Gen. 22:7-8). Yes, God will
provide! Did Abraham go to the mountain hoping God would provide an alternative
to sacrificing his son? Or was he ready to do the unthinkable?
As the
story continues, they reach the appointed place. Abraham builds an altar, binds
Isaac, puts him on the altar, and then lifts the knife over his son. Will he go
through with this horrific act? It sure seems as if Abraham is going to do the
deed. As for the narrative, it gives us no hint that Abraham would do anything
other than complete the task. To this point in the story, we don’t perceive
Abraham as being at all concerned. Is he the kind of guy who blindly does what God
requests? Or does Abraham believe that God will come through at the last moment
and provide the alternative? To this point, there is nothing in the story to
suggest that Abraham believed that God would provide the alternative. Abraham
was a man of faith, and if God demanded his son as a sacrifice, that’s what he
would do. The author of Hebrews seems to believe that is what Abraham would do,
though the author of Hebrews adds a caveat—Abraham could act in this way
because “he considered the fact that God is able even to raise someone from the
dead—and figuratively speaking, he did receive him back” (Heb. 11:17-19). Of
course, the Hebrews text is a post-resurrection passage, but would the Abraham
of Genesis know this to be true? By this point in the story, we have to begin
questioning the goodness of this God of Abraham. Thus, it is a challenging
passage for us to consider.
The
good news is that just as Abraham was getting ready to strike, an angel appears
and calls to him and tells Abraham, in modern parlance: “never mind.” You
passed the test. You showed you were willing to offer up the child of promise,
so don’t lay a hand on the boy. I can only imagine how Abraham must have felt
at that moment. In fact, I can imagine something more than what might be
present in the mind of the author of our passage. I can imagine Abraham feeling
relief. But might he also feel a bit of anger at God? After all, Abraham had
proven himself faithful time and again, so did God need any more proof of his
faithfulness? At least I would have felt a bit of anger at God. But there was
relief as well when Abraham looked up and saw the ram in the thicket. So,
Abraham made the offering and gave the place a name: “The LORD will provide.”
Yes, indeed, God will provide.
As we
read this passage, as a Christian audience, it is traditional to read this
through the lens of the cross. Abraham represents God and Isaac represents
Jesus, such that Jesus dies as our substitute. Thus, Irenaeus wrote: “Righteously
also the apostles, being of the race of Abraham, left the ship and their
father, and followed the Word. Righteously also do we, possessing the same
faith as Abraham, and taking up the cross as Isaac did the wood, follow Him.
For in Abraham man had learned beforehand, and had been accustomed to follow
the Word of God. For Abraham, according to his faith, followed the command of
the Word of God, and with a ready mind delivered up, as a sacrifice to God, his
only-begotten and beloved son, in order that God also might be pleased to offer
up for all his seed His own beloved and only-begotten Son, as a sacrifice for
our redemption.” [Adversus
Haereses, IV.V.4]. But, while this makes sense, it doesn’t take away
the challenge posed by the passage to both Jewish and Christian audiences. The
truth is, this passage has proven challenging to both communities through time.
One who
wrestled with this passage was Soren Kierkegaard in his book Fear and Trembling. In one scenario, Isaac pleads with God to save
him from his father’s murderous intent. In the story Kierkegaard pictures
Abraham murmuring to God: “Lord in heaven, I thank you; it is surely better for
him to believe I am a monster than to lose faith in you” (p. 9). In other words,
Abraham is willing to take the rap for God’s monstrous request. But as the
story goes on, even though the lamb was provided, “from that day on Abraham
became old; he could not forget that God had demanded this of him. Isaac
flourished as before, but Abraham’s eyes were darkened, he saw joy no more” (p.
9). I can see this being true of Abraham. He had acted faithfully to this
point, why would God need to ask more? Why did he need to be tested? As for us,
we need to ask the question of whether God would ask such a thing. Does this
make sense of God?
As we
ponder the message of the passage, including what it says about Abraham’s
faithfulness, could this be a story of hope? David Arnow, a Jewish psychologist,
and author, suggests that perhaps the message here has to do with something
Abraham needed to learn about his covenantal partner. The question raised here
by the provision of the lamb has to do with God’s rejection of human sacrifice
that was common in the era. When God issued the test, Abraham might have
interpreted it in light of cultural norms. Thus, according to Arnow, “The Akedah
gives Abraham a way to find out. He takes the knife to slay Isaac (note:
taking the knife doesn’t mean Abraham was willing to use it), and, sure
enough, an angel of YHWH intervenes, telling Abraham not to raise his ‘hand
against the boy’ (Gen. 22:12). God’s rejection of human sacrifice fulfills
Abraham’s hope in his covenantal partner’s commitment to justice and further
cements their relationship” [Arnow, Choosing Hope, p. 54]. I must say, I
prefer this interpretation to the alternative. Arnow suggests that Abraham knew
deep down that God is good and would provide an alternative sacrifice. Arnow, together with many Jewish
interpreters, unlike Kierkegaard, believe that Abraham had doubts that God
really wanted him to sacrifice his son.
With
the ram provided, the sacrifice is made, and both Abraham and Isaac return home
alive. I wonder, however, whether the relationship between the two changed
after this event. Would Isaac harbor questions about his father’s intent? Might
this story invite us to raise questions about God’s identity and faithfulness?
Is God truly good? In other words, does this story permit us to harbor doubts
about God?
Ultimately,
Abraham does trust that God will provide, even if he’s not sure how that
provision will come to fruition. Walter Brueggemann writes in his commentary on
Genesis that “Abraham finds his only refuge in the divine provider whom he
finds inscrutable but reliable. Abraham has turned from his own way to the way
of God which lies beyond his understanding (cf. Isa. 55:8-9) but upon which he
is prepared to act in concrete ways.” [Genesis, p. 188]. So, how
does this passage speak to us? What does it say about the life of faith.
Turning again to David Arnow, he notes that “from the beginning of his
relationship with God through this test, Abraham consistently evinces inner
strength. He trusts that somehow a way to navigate his various trials will
emerge and acts to find it” [Choosing Hope, pp. 56-57]. We see this,
Arnow suggests, in Abraham’s response when called upon by God or by Isaac:
“Here I am.” That response “connotes a readiness to attend to another, but also
the complete presence of the self, as if to say I am here” [Choosing Hope, p. 57]. Might Abraham’s actions here give expression not only of
doubt but hope? Things could have gone differently, but they didn’t. Might we
find a word of hope for our walk with God in this story? As Arnow suggests, “To
hope means that you keep on going.” As for Abraham, whatever questions he had
about this test, he keeps moving, and as he does so, he remains patient. Thus,
“he hopes that the passage of time will reveal the way through this conundrum.
He doesn’t stiffen or freeze up. He keeps moving, and his movement creates the
space in which the spark of hope burns” [Choosing Hope, p. 57].
We live
in challenging times. Our faith in God is being tested, even if God isn’t
putting us to the test. It would be easy to give up and stop moving. But as
David Arnow reminds us, it is moving forward, even if we don’t have all the
answers, that we give space for an answer to emerge. Thus, hope emerges. That
is good news that can be received from this very challenging passage!
Comments