Wise Investment Policies—Lectionary Reflection for Pentecost 25A/Proper 28A (Matthew 25)
Matthew 25:14-30 New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition
14 “For it is as if a man, going on a journey, summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them; 15 to one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. At once 16 the one who had received the five talents went off and traded with them and made five more talents. 17 In the same way, the one who had the two talents made two more talents. 18 But the one who had received the one talent went off and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money. 19 After a long time the master of those slaves came and settled accounts with them. 20 Then the one who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five more talents, saying, ‘Master, you handed over to me five talents; see, I have made five more talents.’ 21 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things; I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 And the one with the two talents also came forward, saying, ‘Master, you handed over to me two talents; see, I have made two more talents.’ 23 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things; I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 Then the one who had received the one talent also came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew that you were a harsh man, reaping where you did not sow and gathering where you did not scatter, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master replied, ‘You wicked and lazy slave! You knew, did you, that I reap where I did not sow and gather where I did not scatter? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him, and give it to the one with the ten talents. 29 For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance, but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away. 30 As for this worthless slave, throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’
************
It’s
still Monday of Holy Week. Jesus has been holding court for some time. The
theme is at times apocalyptic, looking forward to the day of judgment. In the
parables that Jesus shares, there is an emphasis on wisdom. The previous
parable explored the prior week, spoke of ten virgins (young unmarried
women/bridesmaids), five of whom were wise enough to bring extra oil just in
case the groom was delayed (he was delayed until well into the evening). Thus,
the foolish five were locked out of the wedding banquet, with the wedding
banquet being symbolic of the coming realm (Mt. 25:1-13). There is another
parable here in Matthew 25 that speaks of God’s judgment on the nations (sheep
and goats). That parable will bring the liturgical calendar to a close. In
between these two parables stands one that deals with investment policies. This
is the time of year when many congregations hold their annual stewardship
drives. This is also the Sunday before Thanksgiving.
Many of
us have some form of investment. It might be stock holdings or simply a bank
account. We may have developed a personal investment policy that is designed to
plan for retirement, buying a house, paying for college, or some other
prospective need. It’s helpful to know what you’re doing. You may choose to
decide on investments on your own or turn to a professional. One thing I
learned early on is that investing has an element of risk involved. The least
risky form of investment is a savings account. When I was much younger a
typical passbook account earned five percent interest (in recent years that
passbook might earn you something like .01 % interest, making that 5% look
awfully good). That was basic. If you wanted to earn more you might turn to a
CD, which tended to earn more interest, but it was usually tied up for an
extended period. If you were more risk-tolerant you might turn to stocks, which
could go up or down. The younger you are the more risk-tolerant you can be. So,
how risk-tolerant are you? Oh, and burying your money in the backyard is not
being risk-averse. It’s actually quite risky!
The
parable Jesus offers us here speaks of investment policies. Embedded in this
parable is a conversation about scarcity and abundance. Thus, it is a parable
that speaks to our worldviews. Do we believe that resources are abundant at our
disposal, including spiritual resources? Or do we believe there is scarcity? If
we believe there is abundance, we are more likely to be generous. If scarcity
defines our belief system, we’re more likely to hoard. We see these conflicting
world views on display in the political sphere. It affects a lot of different
areas of concern from immigration policy to climate policy. It influences
foreign policy and domestic policy. It can reveal itself in nationalism, such
that we decide there’s only enough to take care of our own, and therefore we’ll
do whatever is necessary to protect our own. The problem here is that we live
in a global network. “America First” doesn’t work very well because our
economies are so integrated.
While
abundance and scarcity are concepts present in this parable, so are wisdom and
foolishness. When it comes to the investing of “talents,” with talents here
being a monetary unit, the question is what is a wise investment, especially
when the person doing the investing has been entrusted with funds by another?
In other words, the one who is doing the investing is using someone else’s
money. So you want to provide a solid return on the investment.
There
is another element present in this discussion. That element is fear. Fear gets
in the way of living open and expectant lives. While we hear about fearing God,
we also hear words that tell us not to be afraid. So, which is it? Do you live
in fear or hope? Let us remember that fear gets in the way of loving our
neighbors. It gets in the way of dreaming dreams. It gets in the way of
investing our lives in the things of God. Thus, fear and scarcity go
together.
The context within the text is Holy Week, with Jesus’ earthly life near its
end. Matthew’s community, the folks that are reading or hearing this Gospel,
are waiting for the coming of God’s realm in its fullness. These parables have
strong eschatological elements to them. The parable of the ten virgins speaks
to being properly prepared for the arrival of the groom. In this parable, three
different people are entrusted with money to invest by a man who is going on a
trip. When he returns, he hopes to receive back what he is giving these figures
to invest. The question is, what will the man find when he returns? The larger
eschatological question concerns how the people of God are using the resources
Jesus gives the church in the time between his departure and his return. The
man gives to each of the three servants money to invest that is fitting with
their abilities. That is what is entrusted to the person is based on how this
servant has handled previous responsibilities.
This
parable involves a property owner or person of means who calls for his
slaves/servants together and entrusts property to three of them, each according
to their abilities. One gets five talents, one gets two talents, and the third
gets one talent. To get a sense of what we’re talking about—one talent is
equivalent to twenty years of wages for a typical worker. So, we’re talking
about a lot of money, no matter whether it’s the one who gets five or the one
who gets just one to use. We need to remember that slavery in the ancient world
was very different from the chattel slavery of antebellum America. One could be
a manager of an estate and a slave at the same time. We need to remember as
well that the way we use the word talent to speak of skill or ability is not
what Jesus has in mind here. He’s speaking of money and for our purposes, we
probably should stick with that meaning.
Again,
let us remember that this parable, like the ones that surround it, has
eschatological implications. According to Jesus the man who entrusted the money
to his slaves/servants returned from his trip and asked them to give an
accounting of the resources entrusted to their care. So, each of the three stands
before the man and gives an accounting of what they had done with this money.
The first two let the man know they had doubled the investment. The master of
these slaves was pleased and commended them for their efforts. Since they had
proven themselves trustworthy in a few things, they would be entrusted with
more things. In fact, Jesus tells us they entered the joy of their master.
While
the master was very pleased with the work of the first two slaves, how might he
feel about the third slave who was seemingly risk-averse and opted for what he
perceived to be safety (putting the money in a hole in the backyard)? As you
might imagine, the master was not happy. Yes, he got his money back, but unlike
the first two, this third slave lived in fear of losing the money entrusted to
him. He figured that it was better not to lose the money than be penalized for
not earning anything for his master, whom he thought was a harsh man who reaped
where he didn’t sow and gathered what he didn’t invest. While we needn’t
envision the master serving as a stand-in for God, a lot of people think of God
in this way. They approach God as if God is harsh and unfeeling, unwilling to
move even. It also reveals a theology of scarcity versus abundance. The first
two looked at life through the lens of abundance, while he embraced a theology
of scarcity.
Now
comes the question of how God might respond. God commended the first two slaves
for their investment strategy. He’s not happy with that of the third slave. Things
go very badly for this third slave who gets cast into utter darkness where
there is weeping and gnashing of teeth. As we’ll see in the following parable,
something similar is the fate of the goats who face eternal punishment (Mt. 25:46).
This message of judgment that we’ve noticed in previous parables and in the one
to come can cause us a bit of disquiet. Nevertheless, these eschatological
parables speak of accountability and judgment.
When it
comes to judgment, we all face it. It won’t be St. Peter; it will be Jesus.
According to the parable, it will be Jesus who will ask us to give an account
of how we have invested God’s abundant resources. Will we be like the first two
and increase the investment? If so, it appears we will be blessed. If we act
like the third slave and fail to invest the resources, believing that the
master is harsh and capricious, what one has will be taken away. As we read the
master’s response, we must not use this as a cudgel to suggest the poor get
what they deserve, and the rich get blessings. This is not an expression of
retribution dogma. Jesus didn’t believe that riches were a sign of godliness.
Remember that he suggested that riches could impede entering the realm of God (Matthew 19:23-26).
As we ponder this parable, that
speaks of judgment, the more immediate focus is what we do with the time between
the first and second advent. Although, as the previous parable reminds us, the
second advent is delayed, the question for us here is whether we will be
faithful in our usage of God’s resources. Will we bury them out of fear, or
will we invest them, believing that this is our calling? As noted, the lens
through which we look at this question is one of abundance rather than
scarcity.
As we await the coming of God’s realm in its fullness, we
are not called upon to sit back and twiddle our thumbs. We are called to
be at work, sharing in the work of God in the world. An abundance of
resources has been provided to us. We needn’t live in fear if the
investments don’t pan out as we might like, but some effort to use one’s gifts
is expected. Thus, we have in rather graphic terms a word about accountability.
Kate Ott might be on to something when she writes:
If the talents are God’s grace, it is given to be multiplied. Paradoxically, sharing grace with those around us yields more. Grace multiplies to the recipient, for others, and with God’s abundance. The burying of grace results in a diminution of it; concealing it results in rejection. Whether or not one’s theology can be reconciled with various levels of distribution of God’s grace, all receive something and are called to build on what they have. Fear and inaction will be met with harsh judgment, as we hear from the master in the passage. [Connections: ALectionary Commentary for Preaching and Worship (p. 1087). Kindle Edition].
If I might build on this, Ott’s suggestion that talents here
might be understood as expressions of God’s grace can lead us to Paul’s word
about spiritual gifts. As Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 12, to each of one is “given
a manifestation of the Spirit for the common good.” It is the Spirit who gives
to each as the Spirit chooses. The expectation is that we will make use of
these gifts (1 Cor. 12:4-11). With this reference to spiritual gifts in mind, I
will point the readers to my book: Unfettered Spirit: Spiritual Gifts for the New Great Awakening, 2nd Edition.
The good news is, as Ott suggests, sharing these expressions of God’s grace with others yields more grace. Of course, burying it leads to a diminution of God’s grace. So, as we live in the interregnum between the two advents, let us invest God’s grace, for God will hold us accountable. It might not involve being cast into utter darkness, but we will need to give account.
Image Attribution: Fortt, Annette Gandy. Parable of the Talents, from Art in the Christian Tradition, a project of the Vanderbilt Divinity Library, Nashville, TN. https://diglib.library.vanderbilt.edu/act-imagelink.pl?RC=56021 [retrieved November 11, 2023]. Original source: annettefortt.com.
Comments