Another Gospel: Christian Nationalism and the Crisis of Evangelical Identity (Joel Looper) - Review
ANOTHER GOSPEL: Christian Nationalism and the Crisis ofEvangelical Identity. By Joel Looper. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2024. Ix +150 pages.
The nature of the church-state
relationship in the United States has an interesting history. Officially the government is neutral in
matters of religion. It neither establishes nor disallows religious expressions
to exist. Nevertheless, forms of civil religion have existed since the nation
was founded. In the 1950s Congress made the phrase “In God We Trust” the nation’s
motto, pushing aside the unofficial motto of E Pluribus Unum. Politicians
regularly ask God to bless the nation, and invocations are given at civic
events. For the most part, America’s civil religion is vaguely Christian but
only because Christianity is the majority religion in the nation. That said, no
denomination dominates, though certain denominations have an influential
presence in certain states. Consider the role the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints plays in Utah, though the Mormon influence isn't as great
today as it once was. The United States is, at least compared to other Western
nations, both highly religious and religiously diverse.
In recent years we’ve seen a
growing concern about the presence of forms of Christian nationalism in the
United States. It is especially present among white evangelicals, which has largely
aligned itself with a Donald Trump led Republican Party. Numerous books have
emerged in recent years addressing this growing phenomenon in the United States
and elsewhere. Each author and book offers its own take and vantage point.
Among the many books available to us is Joel Looper's Another Gospel. In this book, Looper, an evangelical who
teaches at Baylor University and serves as the coordinator of Shalom Mission
Communities, addresses, as the book’s subtitle reveals, Christian
Nationalism and the Crisis of Evangelical Identity.
As a reader/reviewer who is
post-evangelical and a retired Mainline Protestant (Disciples of Christ)
pastor, I recognize that this book is not directed at me (though perhaps it
does speak to the me of forty-five years ago). Looper writes as an evangelical
to evangelicals calling on them to abandon Christian nationalism, which he
believes leads to the deformation of the church and return to what he calls the
"politics of the church." He's not the first person to speak of this
understanding of the church, which I struggle to fully understand. That said, I
appreciate the reminder that the church can easily get coopted by the culture,
including the political culture.
I found Looper's presentation to be
challenging and at times disconcerting. I found myself at times fully on board
and at others in a very different place. Regarding the latter, I came to the
book as a Mainline Protestant pastor who is politically liberal, open and
affirming when it comes to LGBTQ rights and concerns, and lean pro-choice,
though I've never been comfortable with that wording. He believes that same-sex
relationships are sinful and that gays should remain celibate. He also believes
that abortion is sinful. What distinguishes him from Christian Nationalists and
culture war evangelicals is that he doesn't believe it is the church's role to
push for laws that abolish abortion or limit the rights of LGBTQ persons.
In arguing his point, he describes
the church as being a Gospel people who are defined by Jesus, not American
culture. The current politicized gospel that has merged with Trumpism is
another gospel. Therefore, this form of the church is a deformed version of
Christianity. While he might be theologically and even politically
conservative, he strongly rejects the impact of Trump on evangelicalism. The
result will be, given time, "most of us in the evangelical movement—or, at
any rate, our children—will just be traditionalist, individualist,
conservative, and passionately patriotic Americans. But not Christians"
(p. 20).
If Chapter 1 asks whether today’s
version of white evangelicalism can be defined as a gospel people, Chapter 2
speaks of "Baptizing the National Body." Here he takes us on a bit of
a historical tour from the New Testament to the present. In doing this he
reveals the ways church and state have merged together, and the implications of
that merger for the church. While the United States has never been a Christian
nation, a form of civil religion took root within the churches. That has made
it susceptible to cultural changes that run counter to the Gospel. That
conversation leads to Chapter 3, which is titled "The Scandal of the
Evangelical Heart." In this chapter Looper begins exploring the impact of
Trump on the evangelical church and its embrace of Christian nationalism such
that churches are defining themselves by political realities and not Jesus. He
concludes that “We Americans live and breathe the gospel of America. It’s so
familiar, many of us fail to recognize it unless someone points it out” (p.
68).
Perhaps the best way to view the
current situation in the United States is to look to another expression of Christian nationalism. The
form that Looper chooses is that of “Putin’s Christian Nationalism” (Chapter
4). In my estimation, this may be the most important chapter of the book. What
Looper does here is point out the parallels between Putin’s Christian
nationalism and what is taking form in the United States. While I was surprised
that Looper didn't discuss Victor Orban's version of Christian nationalism, in
many ways Orban is an acolyte of Putin. The Russian president, who once was a
KGB agent, has embraced the Russian Orthodox Church, making the church
essentially an expression of the state. While most Russians don't attend church
or even believe in God, Russian Orthodoxy has become an expression of what it
means to be Russian. With that in mind, Putin uses religion to create a
foundation for his war on Ukraine. He justifies his war as being necessary to protect
the motherland of Russian Orthodoxy, which includes the Crimea. Crimea is
important to this version of Christian nationalism because this is where
Vladimir the Great, the Grand Prince of Kyiv was baptized, effectively making
the Kyivan Rus Christian. What makes Putin so important is that many American
evangelicals look to him as a model protector of Christian supremacy. Putin is
no fool. He's a former KGB agent who knows how to manipulate people, including
religious people to sustain his power. There are warnings here that need to be
attended to.
Looper titles Chapter 5
"Gospel Politics." It is in this chapter that Looper offers his
vision for the politics of the church. In this chapter he defines the kind of
church that steers clear of becoming subservient to the state or the culture.
This discussion of a gospel politics that is not connected with the state, but
one that follows Jesus in loving the neighbor, going the second mile, feeding
the hungry, and more, but most importantly preaching the gospel of Jesus and
not a political system.
That leads us to the final chapter
"Trump and the Gospel of America." Here, Looper writes as an
evangelical to evangelicals telling them that voting for Donald Trump is not
appropriate. Why, essentially, he suggests that by doing so Christians embrace
this Gospel of America that replaces Jesus as Messiah with Donald Trump. He
shows how Trump presents himself in messianic terms, offering himself as the
only one who can save America. Not only that, but he portrays himself as being
on trial as a substitute for his followers. In other words, he has embraced
penal substitutionary atonement and made himself the one who atones for his
followers. Interestingly, Looper shows us that many who consider themselves
evangelicals as they follow Trump no longer feel the need for the church. They
may continue believing traditional Christian ideas, including that the Bible is
the Word of God and even that it is inerrant, but it has become nothing more
than a totem to place on the coffee table. Looper suggests that his point in
writing the book is not to show that evangelicals have been treated fine even
as they have been pushed to the periphery of American culture, rather,
"It's that we never should have made it our business to fight for a seat
at the nation's table" (p. 121). He sees only two paths out of this
situation—repentance or judgment.
As I noted at the top, this is a
book that speaks to a different audience from the one I inhabit. He makes it
clear he has little interest in liberal Mainline Protestantism. He believes
that we also have lost our way, but he doesn't feel it is his place to correct
us. While I may disagree with his assessment of Mainline Protestantism, as well
as not sharing his views on LGBTQ matters and abortion, he speaks important
words to his own community. As for members of the Mainline community, we too
can learn something from what he shares here about the dangers to the church
and its witness of connecting our witness to the politics of the day.
Fortunately, Mainliners do have a text that speaks to us—Baptizing America:How Mainline Protestants Helped Build Christian Nationalism by Bryan
Kaylor and Beau Underwood (Chalice Press). Their book speaks directly to
Mainline Protestants, who they suggest set the wheels in motion for the current
version of Christian nationalism. But we have something we can learn from
Looper as well.
The message that Another Gospel and other
books on Christian nationalism present concerns the impact of nationalism on
both the nation and the church. When we connect church and state in
nationalistic terms, this damages the church and its witness. The issue isn’t
patriotism. We can love the land where we live, but it’s also important to
remember that God and the Christian community transcend the nation.
Comments