Time for a Temple Cleansing—Lectionary Reflection for Lent 3B (John 2)
John 2:13-22 New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition
13 The Passover of the Jews was near, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 In the temple he found people selling cattle, sheep, and doves and the money changers seated at their tables. 15 Making a whip of cords, he drove all of them out of the temple, with the sheep and the cattle. He also poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16 He told those who were selling the doves, “Take these things out of here! Stop making my Father’s house a marketplace!” 17 His disciples remembered that it was written, “Zeal for your house will consume me.” 18 The Jews then said to him, “What sign can you show us for doing this?” 19 Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” 20 The Jews then said, “This temple has been under construction for forty-six years, and will you raise it up in three days?” 21 But he was speaking of the temple of his body. 22 After he was raised from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this, and they believed the scripture and the word that Jesus had spoken.
**********************
When it
comes to the chronology of Jesus’ ministry, John and the Synoptic authors are
often on different pages. That is true when it comes to Jesus’ visits to
Jerusalem. One of the key moments in the telling of Jesus’ story involves his
visit to the Temple, where he becomes distraught by what he sees. He responds
rather violently, turning tables upside down and freeing animals that were
intended to be used in sacrifices. In the Synoptic Gospels, this takes place in
the final days of Jesus’ earthly life and ministry, shortly after the Triumphal
Entry. In John, it takes place at the very beginning of his ministry. You can
try to harmonize these two versions by suggesting that he cleansed the Temple
on two occasions, but that’s probably a fool’s errand.
Our
story of the week takes place, in John’s telling of the story, shortly after
Jesus turned water into wine in Capernaum. After that, Jesus goes to Jerusalem
to celebrate the Passover. It should be noted that the idea that Jesus’
ministry lasted three years is based on John mentioning the Passover on three
occasions (John 2, John 6, and John 11). Unlike the Synoptic telling of the
story, Jesus hasn’t yet entered Jerusalem hailed as the Son of David (Messiah).
He just goes to Jerusalem to celebrate Passover. When he goes to Jerusalem,
like a good pilgrim, he goes to the Temple. It’s important to note that all
four gospels include the story of the cleansing of the Temple. They may place
it in different chronological locations, but the fact that it is included in
all four gospels suggests that Jesus did in fact cause a ruckus in the Temple
by messing with the commercialization of the Temple.
For John, this is Jesus’ first
visit to the Temple. He is horrified by what he sees, because “he found people
selling cattle, sheep, and doves and the money changers seated at their tables”
(vs. 14). In other words, Jesus is offended by the commercialization of a holy
place that he held in high regard. As he enters the Temple he encounters
vendors selling animals for sacrifice (after all, not just any animal is considered
acceptable) and exchanging currency (since not just any form of money is
considered appropriate to do business in the Temple, money must be exchanged,
with the appropriate fee). Now, Jesus doesn’t exactly cleanse the Temple.
That would take a cleaning crew with mops and buckets, but he does obstruct
business as usual by chasing the animals out of the Temple precincts and
overturning the tables of the money changers.
We might compare this occasion to
Martin Luther’s pilgrimage to Rome in 1510, a visit that would contribute to
his effort to reform the church, first from within and then from outside after
his excommunication. While Luther didn’t
make a whip and drive everyone out of the Vatican, reform efforts often begin
with eye-opening experiences such as Jesus’ and Luther’s. For Luther, seeing
the extravagant buildings being built in Rome, including St. Peter’s, building
projects financed in large part by the sale of indulgences, inspired his
attacks on the sale of indulgences. What Luther and Jesus encountered elicited
a rather strong reaction. For Jesus that reaction included what one could say
is an act of violence. When we see something like this with Jesus it can mess
with our picture of Jesus, especially if we assume that Jesus is Mr. Calm,
Cool, and Collected.
What we
see here is a reminder that Jesus often acted as an agent provocateur. By
placing this story up front, John lets us know that the Jesus we will encounter
is going to ruffle feathers, both religious and political. Remember that in
John’s telling this takes place during Passover, when Jerusalem might have been
filled with pilgrims. So, why does Jesus take this action? Is he concerned
about the purity of the Temple or the exploitation of the people for the
benefit of the elite? Let us remember that when Jesus’ ministry began, the
finishing touches were being placed on Herod’s Temple remodeling/reconstruction
project was in its last stages. Herod might be gone, but the project needed to
be finished. Even in the ancient world, it took a lot of money to build
religious buildings. That is especially true when you have before you one of
the great wonders of the ancient world. Reading a passage like this in context
could cause us to pause and consider the nature of church-building projects.
Now, I’m not against church buildings, and I am known to enjoy the aesthetics
of an ancient cathedral, but the passage does cause us to stop and consider
whether church-building projects are expressions of ego and power or meant to
provide space for worship and service to God. Jesus' message to the marketers
using the Temple precincts to sell their wares was this: “Stop making my
Father’s house a marketplace.” Yes,
Jesus claimed God as his father, and he was taking control of his father’s
house so it might not be desecrated.
After
taking this action, the religious leaders and Jewish elite wanted to know by
what authority he acted. In fact, they demanded a sign. Jesus responded by
telling them that if they destroyed this temple, it would be raised back up in
three days. The people are astounded. How can a Temple that had been under
construction for forty-six years be reconstructed in three days? At one level,
Jesus isn’t talking about the Temple in Jerusalem, which would take more than
three days to rebuild. Rather he is speaking of his own body, which will be
“destroyed” and then raised up three days later. As John points out, it is not
until after Jesus’ resurrection that the disciples remember and understand what
is said here.
You
might be wondering how the Temple in Jerusalem, which by the time John wrote
his Gospel had been destroyed by the Romans, relates to Jesus’ body. If we
understand the Temple as being the dwelling place of God, then Jesus is telling
us that he is the dwelling place of God. If you want to encounter God, Jesus is
the eschatological embodiment of God’s presence. At that moment, neither the
challengers nor the disciples can understand what Jesus means here, but the
time will come when it becomes clear. But that will take place after the
resurrection, not before.
The
placement of this event early in the ministry serves to set up the trajectory
that gets carried through the Gospel. Jesus is going to be at odds with the
religious elite and leadership, whom he believes are failing to fulfill their
calling. With great regularity, he calls them out. With that said, what word
might Jesus have for contemporary religious leaders? Diane Chen asks: “Have
power and personal gain threatened to detract the church from its raison d'être?
Do those who hold important responsibilities lead with integrity? Do the
church’s witness and worship honor dishonor God? . . . Where does one seek hope and divine
presence in a world torn by strife?” [Connections, p. 73]. These are the
kinds of questions we face as continue our Lenten journey in the company of
Jesus, the provocateur!
In the
middle of this passage, after Jesus’ provocative act of cleansing the Temple,
John notes that the disciples remembered the saying “Zeal for your house will
consume me.” (Jn. 2:18; Psalm 69:9). That remark reminds us that this act, along with
others, will contribute to Jesus’ ultimate demise. In the Synoptics, this event
takes place in the final week of his earthly life and is one of the pieces of
evidence used against him. While in John this takes place early in the
ministry, it is one of the pieces of evidence that leads to Jesus’ demise. The
placement in the lectionary reminds us that we are moving toward that moment
when Jesus will face his earthly judges. We’re not there yet, but it is coming.
So, get ready!
Image attribution: Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn, 1606-1669. Christ driving the moneychangers, from Art in the Christian Tradition, a project of the Vanderbilt Divinity Library, Nashville, TN. https://diglib.library.vanderbilt.edu/act-imagelink.pl?RC=54708 [retrieved February 27, 2024]. Original source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rembrandt_Harmensz._van_Rijn_024.jpg.
Comments