Seeking God's Design (Richard Lowery, et al) -- A Review

The
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) —my denomination—was born on the
American frontier at the turn of the nineteenth century. It eschewed the
nomenclature of “denomination” for much of its early life. Those who followed
the path of the Campbells and Barton Stone preferred to see themselves as part
of a movement of reform and even restoration rather than being part of a
traditional denomination (even though it had all the trappings of one). However,
by the middle of the twentieth century, many in the Movement (often referred to
as the Brotherhood) began to seek full-fledged denominational status. Those who
supported such a status believed that to do otherwise was to deny the true
identity of this entity known by then as the Christian Churches (Disciples of
Christ). Thus began the process that came to be known as
"Restructure."
Restructure was a process that
culminated in a merger of the National Christian Missionary Convention (the
organized life of African American Disciples) and the predominantly white
International Convention of the Christian Churches (Disciples of Christ). Note
the plural “churches.” This merger, and with it a new identity, was consummated
at the final International Convention/first General Assembly held in Kansas
City in 1968 and then celebrated as the merger of the NCMC and the
International Convention became one entity —born anew as the General Assembly
of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) in Seattle. In the year 2019, the
denomination celebrates fifty years of this merger and the consequent new
identity as the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). This anniversary called
forth a series of conversations and events that celebrated this momentous event
that culminated in this study of this moment in the history of the Disciples of
Christ. This particular book was published in partnership of the Disciples of
Christ Historical Society and the Christian Board of Publication. It was
officially released at the 2019 General Assembly at the joint Disciples of Christ
Historical Society/Council on Christian Unity Dinner (I was in attendance as a
board member of the CCU).
The book draws upon the defining
document of the denomination for its title. The Disciples don't have a
constitution. They have the Design, which Rick Lowery, one of the
editors, suggests is a deeply theological document. The title of the book also
draws on the inaugural theme of the World Council of Churches in 1948:
"Man's Disorder and God's Design." In essence, the argument here is
that in pursuing this new understanding of the Movement, the participants in
that work were seeking God's design. Lowery writes that the movement toward Restructure had an eschatological flavor: "The church, in a fundamental
sense, was 'restructured' to more effectively be an eschatological sign of
God's in-breaking reign" (p. 2). Whether this was and is true is the
question of this moment in history as the Christian Church (Disciples of
Christ) reaches its fiftieth year of existence as a full-fledged
self-identified denomination. Are we truly living out the vision of those who
led the way toward Restructure?
This relatively brief book, which
according to the back cover, is the "first volume of the James and Mary
Dudley Seale Series on Disciples and Public Engagement." It is divided
into three sections. The first section is comprised of two background chapters.
First, in a matter of four pages Duane Cummins, the former President of Bethany
College, offers a word about the context of Restructure. He describes the historical
process that led to the change of status. The second chapter in this section,
written by Lawrence Burnley, describes the part of the story that is often not
acknowledged in our discussions of Restructure, and that is the merger
agreement between the NCMC and the International Convention. He takes note of
the racial dimensions of this move. We often talk about the ecumenical
importance of the process, but what about the merger? Although I am a historian
by training who has studied Disciple history there is much here that is new
(hopefully it's not so new for more recent students of Disciples history). Thus,
the struggles of the African American congregations to gain full recognition
from the broader movement is central to the story told in this book.
Part II is comprised of a series of
questions that were posed by James Searle, the former President of the
Disciples of Christ Historical Society, to participants in the Restructure
process in conversations that took place in the 1980s and 1990s. The questions
and responses center around "the roots of restructure;" "an
Ecclesial Church;" "Congregational Autonomy;" "Covenant;"
"Regions;" and "Accomplishments and Challenges." I found
this section intriguing and insightful. As you read these responses you
discover that the participants had concerns about the process and the outcome.
They celebrated some parts of what occurred and weren't sure that everything
went as hoped. For those of us who came into the denomination long after
Restructure and who are participants in the church now, it is possible to see
the roots of some of our current problems and concerns (at least I can see them
present in these conversations). Obviously, these leaders of the church
couldn't foresee all the challenges that lay ahead (especially the cultural
ones). They may not have been completely aware that the Disciples were taking
on denominational status at the very same time that the nation was moving in an
anti-institutional direction. There were, of course, compromises made then,
that have had long term consequences. These include the status of Regions. Indeed,
the conversation about Regions is worth the price of the book for any Disciple,
especially clergy, who are concerned about the state of our Regions. Might we
have taken a different path that would have proven more effective in the long run
than the one taken? It’s impossible to know for sure, but you have to wonder. These
conversations are fascinating and at times demoralizing, and yet important.
Finally, in part III we come to the present. This section
brings to publication a set of reflections, some of which were shared at a
symposium on the fiftieth anniversary of the Design held at Brite Divinity
School. In these essays, we see how some of the changes that have occurred over
the past fifty years have shaped the denomination as it exists today. We see
how a denomination that was overwhelmingly white with a strong African American
component, has become increasingly diverse. So, we can read Sandhya Jha’s essay
that addresses the question of how this increased diversity will shape the
church as it moves into the next fifty years of its existence. There is an
essay by LaTaunya Bynum (a Regional Minister), who recounts how she learned of
Restructure as a youth when the sign on her church in Detroit changed overnight
to include the words (Disciples of Christ). She speaks to the growing emphasis in
the denomination on peace, justice, mercy, and kindness. Lori Tapia offers an
informative invitation to understand the growing contribution of Latinx
congregations to the life of the church. Bill Lee and Tim Lee have an exchange
related to the frustrations felt by African American Disciples after the merger
(both men have served in the leadership of the church as moderators and vice
moderators). Each of these essays focuses on the growing diversity of the
church and what that means for us. Then several essays raise questions about
whether there is a fatal flaw at the heart of the Design, one that is rooted in
the attempt to make the General units and the Regions church in the same way as
congregations, and whether that contributed to the decline of our
congregations. These essays by Chuck Blaisdell and Dawn Darwin Weaks raise
important questions that will need to be addressed in the years ahead. If
Blaisdell and Darwin Weaks raise the question of the fatal flaw, Kristine Kulp
explores what she calls an "empirical, experimental ecclesiology."
She speaks theologically about such terms as manifestation and covenant that
are commonly used in our tradition. While she views these concepts favorably,
she acknowledges that others do not share her positive feelings about them. Thus,
we move from the past into the present with a view to the future. We are a much
smaller denomination than we were in the 1960s. We entered Restructure with a
lot of optimism, there is a word of hope in these essays, but there is also a
word of caution. Whatever is the case the future will be different from the
past, even if we are guided by ideas and principles that emerged in the past.
This
combination of caution and optimism is present in the concluding remarks of
Rick Lowery, who is the current President of the Disciples of Christ Historical
Society and husband of the former General Minister Sharon Watkins. He concludes
that despite headwinds at the time and struggles since, "the restructured
church they built and the two foundational documents they produced, the Merger
Agreement and The Design, have stood the test of time as testimonies to our
struggle to overcome the sin of America's deeply embedded racism and to witness
to God's just and righteous 'design' for the world." (p. 149). Whether
Lowery is correct in his assessment is, perhaps, up for debate. In any case,
this book offers a unique perspective on the past fifty years in the life in
this denomination I call home. I would suggest that it gets a wide reading from
those of us who inhabit the church we call the Christian Church (Disciples of
Christ). Considering that there have been in recent years conversations about
identity and the lack of understanding of our history and its polity and
theology, this is a book that will help deepen one’s understanding of the
nature of the church. Thus, it is an essential read for any who are Seeking God's Design and questing "for unity and wholeness.
Comments