The Invitation: A Theology of Evangelism (Richard R. Osmer) -- A Review
THE INVITATION: A Theology of Evangelism. By Richard R. Osmer. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2021. Xiv + 281 pages.
What comes to mind when you hear the word evangelism? Is it
a positive or negative reaction? Does it conjure in your mind an image of a
person pushing a tract into your hand as you walk down the street? Or, is it
Billy Graham preaching at one of his crusades (for those of us who can remember
him in life)? In other words, do you equate evangelism with pushing for
conversion?
Most
likely when you think of evangelism you tend to equate it with conversionism. That
concept might begin with the assumption that, according to the New Testament,
humans are by nature sinners and the ultimate fate of sinners is divine
judgment leading to a sentence of eternal torment in hell. That is, unless you
experience salvation in Christ, for the good news is that Jesus died for your
sins. If you accept Jesus as your savior (convert) you will receive forgiveness
of your sins and a spot in heaven when you die. When that message gets shared, it
includes an invitation to pray the sinner's prayer. That is, at least, the
stereotypical understanding of evangelism as conversionism.
Might
there be a different understanding of evangelism that comports better with
Mainline Protestant understandings of the divine-human relationship, one that
doesn’t focus on conversion as the desired outcome? Osmer’s definition of evangelism, which is
developed in the course of the book, is this "Evangelism is the invitation
to respond to the gospel, the good news of God's salvation of the world in
Jesus Christ, which is offered to others as part of the witness of the church
under the guidance and persuasive power of the Holy Spirit." (p. 12). He
explores this idea in conversation with Scripture, primarily Paul's letters
along with the Gospels of Mark (representing the Synoptics) and John (Part 1).
He also explores this definition in conversation with the theology of Karl
Barth (part 2). The choice of Barth is rooted in Osmer's own theological roots,
which have been heavily influenced by Barth. It is good to remember that Barth
is an important theological conversation partner at Princeton where Osmer has had
a long tenure. In the course of the conversation with Scripture and Barth,
Osmer includes case studies drawn from his courses at Princeton in evangelism.
These case studies unearth real-life understandings, both positive and negative,
toward evangelism. They also give a very practical edge to the presentation.
His
vision of evangelism as invitation is reflected in six principles. First, God
is the one who calls, so that the evangelist delivers an invitation on
behalf of God. Secondly, God's call comes through the gospel, which is
the "story of God's love of the world in Jesus Christ." Third, those
who respond to God's call receive a new identity as followers of Jesus who are
part of a community. Fourth, this community of disciples is called upon
to bear witness to the gospel. Fifth, "the mission of witness
encompasses saying, doing, and being the gospel." For many
mainliners, it's the "saying" part that is problematic. Faith is
often deemed to be "private" and should be kept to ourselves. I’ve
heard folks regularly claim the authority of St. Francis of Assisi: “Preach
the gospel at all times. And if necessary, use words.” For many words are
rarely if ever necessary. We do good things, but we don't say why we do good
things. The sixth principle is that “evangelism is the ministry of inviting
others to hear Christ's call to come and follow him." Of course, an invitation
does require words. (pp. 15-16).
Osmer wants
to root this vision of evangelism as invitation in Scripture. In pursuit of
this goal, he chooses to engage with the writings of Paul, Mark (representing
the Synoptics), and John. With this foundation, he turns to the writings of Karl
Barth, who developed a specific understanding of evangelism—or as Barth preferred,
"evangelization." He points to Barth as the most helpful resource in
developing a vision of evangelization as invitation. One of the elements of
Barth’s theology of evangelism involves the church as witness. As Barth declared
in the Church Dogmatics “The Church is either a missionary Church or it
is no church at all” (p. 150). Those whom he envisions being evangelized
include the unaffiliated as well as those who are nominally Christian (remember
that for Barth, evangelism does not seek just a one-off experience, but one
that occurs regularly throughout our lives).
As
Martha Grace Reese had earlier demonstrated, Mainline Protestants shy away from
evangelism, which is one of the reasons for the decline in membership. We
simply do not invite people to experience the blessings of being in a relationship
with Jesus. Osmer takes this a step further and roots it in theology. He has an
important practical section, but that is rooted in the theological foundations
already established. He demonstrates as well that invitation fits more closely
with the understanding of evangelism present in Scripture. Therefore, it can
serve well mainliners who are open to reenvisioning evangelism for our time and
do this in a theologically responsible way. For mainliners who have shied away
from sharing their faith (with words and not simply through their good works)
with others because of how evangelism has been understood, this comes at just
the right time. This is a book that exemplifies practical theology. It has practical
application, but it is deeply theological. It is accessible but not an easy
read (Barth is himself not an easy read). In the end, I recommend Osmer’s The Invitation highly. Of course, I will admit that I did resonate with his
engagement with Barth, whom I’ve long found to be a most helpful conversation
partner. But, even if you are not Barthian, I believe this is a worthy conversation partner.
Comments