The Grand Adventure of Blessing the Nations—Lectionary Reflection for Lent 2A (Genesis 12)
Genesis 12:1-4 New Revised Standard Version Updated
Edition
12 Now the Lord said to Abram, “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. 2 I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. 3 I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”
4 So Abram went, as the Lord had told him, and Lot went with him. Abram was seventy-five years old when he departed from Haran.
***********
The
reading from Genesis 2 and 3 that served as the first reading for the First
Sunday of Lent describes how things went wrong in the garden, leading to exile
from the garden. While God decides that at least for the moment it wouldn’t be
wise for humanity to continue to have access to the Tree of Life, that doesn’t
mean God gave up on humanity (though the story of Noah suggests that God might
have had second thoughts about creating humanity—Genesis 6:5-8—but that’s a
different story that I’d rather not explore at the moment). While the opening
chapters of Genesis tell the story of humanity gone awry where everyone does
what is right in their own eyes, when we get to Genesis 12, we see the
beginning of something new. Abram and his wife, Sarai, appear for the first
time in Genesis 11, where Abram’s father moves the family from Ur to Haran,
where Terah died. That’s where we pick up the story in Genesis 12.
I’ve
come to believe that this chapter is foundational to the Christian story (as
well as the Jewish and Islamic stories). Before we get to Genesis 12, I want to
turn for a moment to Matthew 1, Matthew begins his gospel with “An account of
the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham”
(Genesis 1:1). I want to take note of Matthew’s genealogy in part because he
starts his genealogy in a different place from Luke, who takes Jesus’ lineage back
to Adam (Luke 3:23-28). I believe that Matthew chooses to start with Abraham
because he believes Jesus’ ministry/calling is rooted in the call of Abram that
is first recorded in Genesis 12 [see my book Called to Bless, pp.
17-26].
Here in
Genesis 12 Yahweh (Adonai-LORD) appears to Abram, who is at the time residing
at Haran. With the death of Terah his now head of the family. God tells Abram
to pack up the family (including the extended family) and head to “a land I
will show you.” Note that God doesn’t give a final destination. Abram can’t get
out his Google map and plot a course to the land God was sending him. If he was
to take this journey asked of him, he would have to take a step of faith (Gen.
12:1).
In
verse 2 of Genesis 12, God reveals a promise. If Abram takes this step of faith
God will in turn make him a great nation. Not only that God will make Abram’s
name great so that he might be a blessing. Here is the key word—if he takes up
this calling he will become a blessing. That is, he will become the source of
blessing for others. One might assume the blessings will start with the family
but remember that God promises to make him a great nation. To this point, Abram’s
family isn’t that large. There’s Sarai and his nephew Lot and Lot’s family. As
for Sarai and Abram, they don’t have any children of their own. So, how will
God make them a great nation? Besides, in a tribal world, moving into a strange
land was itself risky. What if the folks at the end destination weren’t too
keen on this group of migrants from entering their land? They might even
perceive this to be an invasion by a group of outsiders. So, the promise might
be enticing, the question was how would it work out.
Of
course, our reading is not yet complete. Not only does God promise to make a great
nation out of Abram so that he might be a blessing, but this blessing would
extend to the nations. So, whoever blesses Abram will be blessed and whoever
curses him will be cursed. The second part is problematic, but for our purposes,
I want to focus on part 1, the part about blessing the families of the earth.
The
outworking of this call has many twists and turns. As the story continues, God
covenants with Abram in Genesis 15, where God promises descendants to Abram.
God does the same in Genesis 17, though by that time Abram has a son through
Hagar, who was Sarai’s slave/servant. While Abram received Ishmael as the one who
would carry on the covenant promises, even circumcising him (Genesis 17), but still
has something else in mind. That something else involves a child born to Sarai
(Sarah), who will carry the name of Isaac. When it comes to the outworking of
the promise God makes to Abram, the Book of Hebrews notes that while Abraham
set out “not knowing where he was going,” he and his descendants, Isaac and
Jacob, all lived in tents never truly receiving the land of promise.
Nevertheless, despite Sarah’s initial
inability to bear a child, the promise revealed itself over time, but “all of
these died in faith without having received the promises, but from a distance,
they saw and greeted them” (Hebrews 11:8-13). There would be times when Abraham
took matters into his hands, such as when in pursuit of an heir he took Sarah’s
slave, Hagar, and had a child with her. Despite the twists and turns, the
journey to blessing starts here and continues through the Covenant of Sinai to
that of Calvary and the embrace of the Gentiles into God’s realm.
Jews,
Christians, and Muslims all interpret the call of Abraham differently. For one
thing, Muslims hail Ishmael rather than Isaac as the one through whom the
covenant blessing is passed on to later generations. So, as a Christian, I
interpret the call of Abraham through the lens of Jesus. He is, as Paul
suggests, the seed of Abraham through whom the blessings of God would be
revealed to the nations (Gal. 3:15-18). This is
the message of Matthew’s genealogy (Matthew 1:1-17). For Matthew, Jesus, the
Messiah, is the son of David and the son of Abraham. By connecting Jesus’
mission to Abraham, he envisions Jesus as the one through whom all the nations
will be blessed. That is, he will save the people from their sins (Mt.1:21).
From this perspective, the coming of Jesus is not a course correction on the
part of God, but a natural extension of the call of Abraham.
Here is
where we must be careful not to suggest that the church replaces Israel or that
the Jews got things wrong, but Jesus got things back on track. The way I read
things, according to Paul, the Gentiles were grafted into the olive tree that
is Israel so that the nations might share in the blessing that God first
promised to Abraham and Israel (Rom. 11). As we ponder the call and the end
result, it is wise to remember the promise of Second Isaiah, that Israel would
be a light to the nations so that God’s salvation would reach the ends of the
earth (Is. 49:6).
Theologian
Clark Williamson devoted much attention to the question of the church’s
relationship to Israel, especially in a post-Shoah world. He writes that “Israel
was to be a priestly people, serving others, not itself. God’s covenant was not
merely for Israel’s good but for the good of all human beings, Gentiles and
Jews. God chose Israel as an instrument so that all peoples may come to know
God and God’s purposes for them” [A Guest in the House of Israel, p.
125]. The covenant, it would seem, is expanded in Christ to include we who are
followers of Jesus as members of the extended family. That is, Gentiles who are grafted into the family in Christ also are
called to be a blessing to the nations. The call first broached in Genesis 12
was formalized more fully in Genesis 15 when the promise of a child/heir is
given. That covenant promises is again explicitly restated in Genesis 17 when
God changes the names of Abram and Sarai to Abraham and Sarah.
Getting
back to Genesis 12, when Abram answered the call on behalf of the family, not
knowing where God would lead them, though the general direction appears to be
the land of Canaan, he did have a promise in hand. That promise involved
becoming a great nation through which the nations would be blessed. Abraham’s
descendants would have understood themselves to be the recipients of that call
themselves. While one particular nation received the promise, the blessings
embedded in that promise extended to the entire creation.
For
Christians, this means recognizing that we have been, as noted earlier, grafted
into the olive tree that is Israel. We have been adopted into the family
through the one who is the seed of Abraham. But as the Gentiles are drawn into
the family, and blessed by God, that doesn’t nullify the previous covenant (Gal.3:15-18). There is a tendency for Christians to read Paul in a supersessionist
manner so that Jesus replaces Israel. That would be inappropriate. For our
purposes, let us simply understand Paul’s reference to seed to be a sign that
God always intended to bring all of creation into the fold, and that Israel
plays an important role in this, as does Jesus, and through Jesus, we have been
added to the agents of blessing.
While there will always be interpretive questions to wrestle with when it comes
to what it means to claim descent from Abraham on the part of three religious
traditions that have often been at odds with each other, it seems wise to
affirm the common ancestry so that we can move to what it means to be a
blessing to the nations. It is good to remember that the blessing with which we
are to bless is a gift of God.
The question for those of us who are Christians as we ponder this passage
concerns the nature of this blessing and how we share it with the world. For many
modern readers, the word blessing may seem quaint and therefore not very
meaningful. However, when we consider the Hebrew word that is translated as to
bless (barak), it is understood to be a counterpoint to curses (that is
the message here in Genesis 12—those who bless Abram will be blessed, while
those who curse him will be cursed). As such, it is suggestive of good things
such as well-being, fruitfulness, and flourishing. The message here is that God
is calling Abram to be a source of blessing so that he and all who bless him
will flourish. When it comes to what it means to flourish, Miroslav Volf
suggests that to flourish means that one does not live by bread alone. Volf
writes in his book Flourishing that the global world needs religion if
it is to flourish (be blessed). In that regard, he writes that “when we live by
bread alone, there is never enough bread, not enough even when we make so much
of it that some of it rots away; when we live by bread alone, someone always
goes hungry; when we live by bread alone, every bite we take leaves a bitter
aftertaste; . . . living by ‘mundane realities’ and for them alone, we remain
restless and that restlessness, in turn, contributes to competitiveness, social
injustice, and the destruction of the environment as well as constitutes a
major obstacle to more just, generous, and caring personal practices and social
relationships.” The material is important, but it’s not sufficient. Thus, we
need more than mere bread, we need the bread of life. [Volf, Flourishing, p.
22].
As I
read scripture, I see a thread running from creation (Genesis 1) to the new
creation (Revelation 22). It runs through Abram and on to Jesus. While God
calls Abram and his descendants to be agents of blessing to the nations, to be
in Christ is to be grafted into that tree of blessing so that we too might be agents
of God’s blessings to the world. As Paul reminds us in Romans 4, this is a
calling received by faith (Rom. 4:1-5, 13-17) because it is a gift of grace.
Comments