Why I Am a Protestant (Beth Felker Jones) - Review
WHY I AM A PROTESTANT. By Beth Felker Jones. Downer’s Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2025. X + 141 pages.
I was born and raised Protestant.
In fact, during my childhood, the official name of the church of my birth was
the Protestant Episcopal Church of America. Later on, the word Protestant was
dropped, but it remains Protestant. Decades later, I'm still a Protestant,
though I sometimes wonder what it is I'm supposed to be protesting. One thing I
can say is that when it comes to the churches/denominations that fall under the
Protestant umbrella, they’re not all on the same page. Protestantism runs the
gamut from Pentecostal to Episcopal. Some are creedal and others are not. Some
baptize by immersion on profession of faith, while others baptize infants with
much less water. That said, the churches that live under the Protestant label
have roots that go back to the Reformation, even if that connection is rather
indirect. To say we are Protestant may come down to not being Roman Catholic (we’re
not part of the Orthodox community, but we Protestants aren’t protesting
against Eastern Orthodoxy).
Having placed myself in the
category of being a Protestant, I am ready to approach Beth Felker Jones' book,
Why I Am Protestant. This book is one of three in a series from IVP
Academic, the other two being written by Roman Catholic and Orthodox (not yet available) representatives. I've not read the other two books in this ecumenical series,
but having read Jones' book, I'm intrigued to read the others. As to the
identity of the author of this book, Beth Felker Jones holds a PhD in theology
from Duke University and teaches theology at Northern Seminary (historically an
American Baptist seminary). She is, by choice, a United Methodist. While she
respects the Roman Catholic and Orthodox traditions, she is a fully committed
Protestant.
Jones acknowledges that "this
book doesn't provide a comprehensive account of Protestantism, whether
historically, theologically, or globally." Nevertheless, it does narrate
her "own way of sorting through some key theological matters of Protestant
Christian faith and life" (p. 3). One should not expect a comprehensive
look at Protestantism in a book of 141 pages, but Jones does an excellent job
of laying out the basic foundations of this tradition, always keeping in mind the
fact that Protestantism is not monolithic and that Protestantism is not the only
branch of the Christian tradition. 
The first chapter of the book is
titled "Why I Am a Christian." I am assuming that each of the three
books in the Ecumenical series begins in the same way. This is an appropriate
place to start, since no matter what tradition one hails from, they (we) are
first of all Christians and then members of our various traditions. This
chapter does give Jones the opportunity to tell her own faith story. She
narrates some of the basic foundations of the Christian faith, which are shared
more broadly across traditions, such as the doctrine of the Trinity and the
Chalcedonian position on Jesus.
While she is first and foremost a
Christian, something she shares with other non-Protestant traditions, she is
also more particularly a Protestant, which is the subject of the second
chapter. Here she notes that some in her family and friendship circles have
left Protestantism for Roman Catholicism. However, she remains firmly within
Protestantism. She understands the frustration some feel about difficulties
with interpreting scripture and concerns about religious authority.
Nevertheless, she remains convinced that, at least for her, the Protestant way
is best. She suggests that she is Protestant because she is catholic, that is,
as a Protestant, she is part of the universal church. She is also orthodox as a
Protestant, for it offers a way of being in right relationship with God. She is
also Protestant because the tradition is Reformed. That is, it is rooted in a
tradition of reform that includes the five solas that "testify to
the heart of Protestantism, calling the church away from human sin and error
and back to God alone" (p. 33). She concludes her chapter with this
statement: "I am convinced that Protestant Christianity offers the most
faithful and livable way for the church to follow its call to catholicity,
orthodoxy, and reformed faith" (p. 35).
Chapter three is titled "How
Protestantism Helps Me Be Christian." Among the elements of Protestantism
that she finds meaningful is the way it enables her to know God in a sinful
world, especially through Scripture, which reveals God's goodness, truth, and
beauty amidst the brokenness of the church. One of the reasons Jones embraces
the Protestant faith is that, in its fragmented state, it acknowledges being
broken and imperfect. She finds this to be a good thing. She also finds within
the Protestant tradition's emphasis on scripture a path to intimacy with God.
She also appreciates Protestant ecclesiology (though some might question
whether there is such a thing) because of its diversity. Here she draws upon
Augustine, especially his works on the challenge of Donatism (a schismatic
movement that sought to create a pure church in the after Constantine’s embrace
of Christianity). What she finds helpful in Augustine isn't his contempt for
Donatism or his dislike of institutional division. Rather, it is to be
"found in his insight into the work of grace, even in a church he deemed
theologically disastrous." In what way did he do that? In recognizing that
God could be at work even among the Donatists (p. 49). Thus, she appreciates an
ecclesiology of grace rather than one that is institutionally focused.
In chapter four, Jones returns to
the question of "Doing Church." In this chapter, she makes use of the
idea of "branch ecclesiology," a perspective that has roots in
Anglicanism. In using this concept, she speaks of the diversity of ecclesiologies
within the larger church. Here again, she addresses the way the church exists,
contrasting the Catholic institutionalism with Luther's vision of the church as
action. The focus is on what the church does, such as preaching the gospel, not
its institutional dimensions. Again, she focuses on the idea of unity in
diversity, using the branch theory. Thus, unity is found not in the branches
but in the root, which is Jesus. She writes that "Branch ecclesiology
helps us to imagine a church that is both universal and local, one that draws
its vitality from living connection with the one root, the Jesus of the
Gospel" (p. 65). Ultimately, she embraces an ecclesiology that counts
every church as a church.
While Jones is fully committed to
the Protestant principle, she acknowledges "The Difficulties of
Protestantism" (Chapter 5). She writes, rightly, that every tradition has
its strengths and weaknesses. The weaknesses present in Protestantism include
its tendency toward individualism, fragmentation, and the nature of authority.
The first two are fairly obvious. As for the third area of concern, that of
authority, the issue is a bit more complex. The authority of scripture is
generally affirmed (sola scriptura), but even here, there are questions
as to how scripture represents God's voice due to competing interpretations of
Scripture. While these are problems, there are strengths as well, including the
possibility of religious toleration and religious freedom. Thus, despite its
messiness, sola scriptura has its benefits. In part, this is due to the
recognition that the church itself is not perfect as an authority. Ultimately,
there is the possibility of a peaceful pluralism of traditions, which can prove
valuable.
While Protestantism has its
weaknesses, in chapter six, Jones speaks of "The Peculiar Strengths of
Protestantism." For Jones, one of the reasons for staying is that the
Protestant tradition has proven to be a loving home. This is due to several
elements of the tradition, beginning with "Gratia" or Grace.
Again, she looks back to Augustine for help, recognizing that Luther, among
others, looked to Augustine's emphasis on grace as helpful in the reform
effort. Thus, Protestantism privileges grace as foundational. While the church
is good and God chooses to work through it, it is broken. Thus, it is God's
grace that sustains us amid this brokenness. She points to the unity of the
baptismal font and the Lord's table as signs of that graciousness (though we
still struggle with the Table).
The penultimate chapter is titled
"Hopes for Christian Unity in Diversity" (Chapter 8). Having
acknowledged that fragmentation is one of Protestantism's weaknesses, she also
affirms its allowance for diversity. So, how do we find unity in the midst of
this diversity? Here she speaks of the "One Font, One Table." I agree
that the baptismal waters and the bread of heaven are central signs of the
church, but I'm a little less sanguine when it comes to the oneness that exists
within our churches. Nevertheless, there are commonalities among Protestants
when it comes to these two sacraments. She also speaks of Protestantism
representing a global faith, such that we are a diverse people. That again is
true. It is becoming more diverse as new forms emerge, and local branches
emerge that represent more contextual versions of the one faith. There is the
possibility of flexibility here, which is a good thing. Thus, contextual
diversity represents God's love of different contexts. Ultimately, the final
healing will not take place until we are "gathered around the thrown of
the Lamb" (p. 124).
The final chapter lifts up three
scriptural passages that Jones believes can prove valuable to Protestantism.
They may not be the ones everyone would expect. Her suggestions include
Ephesians 2:11-22 (breaking down dividing walls); 2 Timothy 3:10-17 (the one
about the inspiration of Scripture); and Luke 1:46-55 (the Magnificat of Mary).
I will let readers see why she chose these three, none of which speak to
justification by grace through faith.
Beth Felker Jones, an admitted
theology nerd and committed Protestant, in writing this brief volume titled Why I Am Protestant, invites readers to consider the strengths and weaknesses
of the Protestant branch (branches) of the Christian faith. She offers a
respectful view of other options, but finds that at least for her,
Protestantism best represents her understanding of the Christian faith. As a
Protestant myself, I largely resonated with her picture, though I might have
questions at points. If you are not a Protestant but wondering what these folks
believe, and admittedly, Protestants are a very diverse lot, then I believe you
will find in Why I Am a Protestant a helpful guide. The same is true if
you are a Protestant and you wonder why that is true!
You may purchase copies of this book from your favorite retailer, including my Amazon affiliate and my Bookshop.org affiliate.

Comments