The Christian Past that Wasn't: Debunking the Christian Nationalist Myths that Hijack History (Warren Throckmorton) - Review


THE CHRISTIAN PAST THAT WASN’T: Debunking the Christian Nationalist Myths that Hijack History. By Warren Throckmorton. Minneapolis, MN: Broadleaf Books, 2026. Ix + 319 pages.

There has been a decades-long debate as to whether the United States is a Christian Nation. It has become a major debate in recent years and even months as the nation approached its 250th anniversary, while the country is being led by a President who has embraced, largely for political reasons, a nationalist vision with a “Christian” tint. Although Christians of some stripe have indeed formed the nation’s religious majority, even what defines a Christian has long been contested. To give a recent example, the Department of Defense listed the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints separately from a series of Christian denominations. Once upon a time, many Protestants would have excluded Roman Catholics from their definition of Christian. The truth is that the nation has been religiously diverse from the beginning, especially if we include the indigenous population who were not Christians (of course, they were not included in the definition of American citizenship). Regarding the indigenous population of the Americas, one would be well served by reading Daniel Hawk’s recent important book: Undoing Manifest Destiny: Settler America, Christian Colonists, and the Pursuit of Justice. As Hawk demonstrates, European settlers, most of whom claimed to be Christian, have a less-than-stellar reputation. Although there are efforts underway during the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, marking the American colonies' break from British rule, to emphasize only what makes the nation look good ("Patriotic History"), things are a lot more complicated than some would like us to believe.

So, is the United States a "Christian nation?" While some would make that claim, at least constitutionally, we are not. The Constitution says nothing about Christianity, and in fact, rules out religious tests for political offices. Then there is the First Amendment, which prohibits the establishment of religion. So, although there are plenty of mythmakers and storytellers who would tell us otherwise, respondents have demonstrated that there is significant evidence that what these storytellers are doing is hijacking American history in support of their version of Christian nationalism.

I have shared word about a number of the respondents to the Christian nation proponents, and in this review I offer my take on one of the latest efforts to address the myths surrounding the idea that the United States was, at its birth, Christian. The book I offer here is Warren Throckmorton's The Christian Past that Wasn't: Debunking the Christian Nationalist Myths that Hijack History (Broadleaf, 2026). Throckmorton is a retired psychology professor who taught for many years at an evangelical Christian College and, with Michael Coulter, is the author of Getting Jefferson Right: Fact-Checking Claims About Thomas Jefferson. He has devoted significant time pushing back against purveyors of Christian nationalist myths such as David Barton. He has committed himself to unmasking efforts to portray the Founders as evangelical Christians, intent on making the United States a Christian nation. He writes not as a non-believer, but as a committed Christian. In this excellent, must-read book, Throckmorton unpacks, step-by-step, the myths told by such figures as the pseudo-historian David Barton (who has the ear of the President and others around the President),  and his supporters. Although Throckmorton is not a professional historian, in offering his responses, he has consulted with leading American historians, while bringing his background in psychology to the conversation. One of the values of this book and other works by Warren Throckmorton is that he helps us understand why people embrace myths about the nation's founding.

In the opening chapter of Throckmorton’s The Christian Past that Wasn’t, which is titled "Why Do People Believe America was Founded as a Christian Nation? he speaks to the psychological elements of belief in the idea that the United States was founded as a Christian nation. This is a belief that has important implications for an increasingly diverse and pluralistic nation. Fear of change, especially in demography, makes people susceptible to believing myths told by people like David Barton and allies, which includes, for example, the current Speaker of the House. In this opening chapter, Throckmorton defines Christian nationalism as the belief that the United States was born as a Christian nation and should stay that way. Thus, there is an effort to pursue power to enforce a particular form of Christianity on the nation. Why? Because there is a sense of safety in being part of a state that shares your beliefs. Plus, one can find hope in the power that comes from believing God is on one's side.

While there might be psychological triggers to belief that the United States is and always has been a Christian nation, where does one find support for the myths that undergird this belief system? History plays an important role, or I should say "pseudo-history." In Chapter 2, titled "Hijacking History," Throckmorton explores how proponents of a Christian nation ideology have misused and misconstrued history to support their position, starting with the famed painting of George Washington kneeling in prayer at Valley Forge. Throughout the book, the name David Barton, a self-proclaimed historian with no credentials, will come up as the key storyteller. Barton has the ear of powerful leaders, including Mike Johnson and even Donald Trump. One of the figures that Barton depends on in his portrayal of his vision of the United States as a Christian nation is Parson Mason Weems (1759-1825), who is responsible for many of the myths told about Washington and the nation’s founding. These myths include the story of Washington's famous encounter with a cherry tree. Then there is Barton's book The Jefferson Lies, which was pulled from production by its publisher after it was demonstrated that Barton's book was full of historical errors. Nevertheless, Barton remains an important contributor to the hijacking of history, supported by leading evangelical entities such as Focus on the Family. There are other contributors to the mythos, including Francis Schaeffer and, more recently, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson. Letting go of the myths might be difficult, but as Throckmorton notes, it might make us a bit freer.

Having introduced us to why people are susceptible to the mythmaking that goes with belief in a Christian founding of the United States, aided by the hijacking of history in pursuit of an agenda, Throckmorton offers a series of seven chapters that lay out the myths that go with this embrace of Christian nationalism. While this is an important effort, I'm afraid that many who embrace the idea of a Christian founding of the United States are immune to this important medicine for the soul of the nation. This is unfortunate because it prevents the nation from embracing its true ideals as set out in the Declaration of Independence.

The first myth that Throckmorton explores is found in Chapter 3, "Myth One: America Is a Covenant Homeland for European Protestants." There is a myth being told by figures such as Kenneth Copeland that God made a covenant with the founders so that the United States would be a covenant nation for European Protestants. That should give us pause because not only would this covenant rule out Jews, Muslims, Hindus, etc., from being part of the national ethos, it would also rule out Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Christians. Of course, some defenders of a Christian America go back to Columbus in their efforts to define the nation as Christian, pointing to the papal declaration that gave support to the European conquest of the Americas (Doctrine of Discovery). As for North America, the settlers in what became the United States were largely Protestant, which led to religious establishments that affirmed Protestant dominance. They also tended to portray the indigenous people as savages whose land could be seized. He goes through the stories starting with Jamestown and moving through the Plymouth colony to George Washington's oath of office. The goal of the efforts by purveyors of this covenant idea is to show that the United States is designed to be a nation for White Anglo-Saxon Protestants. Besides the racist dimension of this idea, it ignores how, according to Scripture, God makes covenants.

In Chapter 4, we look at "Myth Two: America is a Christian Nation Because the Colonies Had State Churches." While it is true that during the colonial period the majority of colonies had established churches, the exceptions being Rhode Island and a few others, that doesn’t mean that this is precedent for continued establishment after the Constitution, with the Bill of Rights put in place. The question is whether those establishments provide support for a Christian founding, such that the structure of the government was designed to support Protestant Christianity. It should be noted that by 1833, even the states with religious establishments, namely Massachusetts, had disestablished their church-state relationships. Disestablishment actually proved to be a boon for the churches, as well as the states. Thus, the emphasis would be on religious freedom. The next myth, "Myth Three," has to do with the suggestion that "America Is a Christian Nation Because the Founders Were Orthodox Christians" (Chapter 5). Here is where things get tricky because some of the Founders were orthodox Christians, while others were not. A number of them, including George Washington, appear to derive more of their religious thought from their involvement with Freemasonry, including much of the language used to speak of divinity.  The suggestion that Jefferson and Adams were orthodox is clearly a myth, as both were Deists/Unitarians. This leads us to "Myth Four: The Founders Created a Christian Government" (Chapter 6). In this chapter, Throckmorton explores the role of religion in the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution to see what they say about Christianity and the government, addressing suggestions that the founders wanted a Christian form of government. If anyone pays attention to the Constitution, God is not mentioned, while religious tests are explicitly rejected. Then, of course, there is the First Amendment. Throckmorton speaks to the ways in which all of these decisions were made. He also addresses Jefferson's letters with the Danbury Baptists, in which Jefferson declares that the Constitution created a wall between church and state, something these early American Baptists supported. There is a lot more here that speaks to the diversity of religious views among the Founders, something underscored by the Treaty of Tripoli, which stated clearly that the United States was not a Christian nation. Therefore, legally, there is no support for the United States being a Christian nation.

As we move on to the next myth— "Myth Five: The Charter Documents Are Based on the Bible and Christianity" (Chapter 7)—once again Throckmorton debunks the myth of a Christian foundation for the United States. Here, he addresses the myth that suggests the founders based the founding documents on the Bible, even arguing that large chunks of the documents are biblical quotations. He demonstrates quite clearly the falsehood of these suggestions, noting that not only did the authors of these documents not mention the Bible, but they regularly appealed to Greek and Roman philosophers, along with  Enlightenment figures such as John Locke.

There is a move endorsed by Donald Trump, and people in his orbit, that has called for the teaching of what they call Patriotic History. This form of “history” seeks to highlight the positives of American history while downplaying the negatives, such as slavery and the genocide of Native Americans. Supporters of Christian Nationalism are clearly embarrassed by these realities because they want to eliminate them from the story, especially since supporters of both slavery and manifest destiny often rooted their support of these efforts in their reading of the Bible. Thus, in the view of supporters of the Christian founding of the nation, America's virtues so outweigh America's sins, such that they can be ignored. Throckmorton, fortunately, doesn't let this pass scrutiny.

The final myth, "Myth Seven," suggests that "Christianity Should be Promoted in Public Education." There is a myth that, before the 1963 Supreme Court case that abolished school prayer because it functioned as an establishment of religion, the Bible and Prayer were prominent in the nation's public schools. Because this was once true, to return the nation to its roots, school prayer and Bible reading should be restored. So, we see efforts to post the Ten Commandments and even mandate the teaching of the Bible in places like Texas and Oklahoma. In Oklahoma, the former Superintendent of Public Education wanted to mandate use of the so-called Trump Bible, which included within its covers the founding documents, suggesting that the Bible was a founding document. While some states did mandate prayer and Bible reading in their schools before 1960, it was not universal. Besides, publicly funded/mandated education didn't develop until long after the nation's founding. As he points out, one of the reasons why public education was developed, and Bibles were to be used, had to do with the Protestant confrontation with Roman Catholics. The mandated use of the King James Version did not sit well with Roman Catholics, who responded by creating a parallel school system. Now, the question concerns whether the current Supreme Court will open things up for the introduction of religion into public education by undermining the wall of separation.

Warren Throckmorton’s The Christian Past that Wasn’t is an important book that is essential reading at this moment in history because it addresses many of the myths put forth by supporters of Christian nationalism. These efforts seek to embed a particular form of Christianity in the founding so that it might be used to push back against the growing pluralism of the nation. As he notes in his conclusion, this book offers important evidence for those who question this Christian-America folklore, enabling them to push back against the purveyors of this folklore as they pursue a quasi-establishment of Christianity as the state religion. I, for one, am grateful for Throckmorton’s efforts because if the purveyors of this Christian nation mythology succeed, I believe that their efforts will end badly for both church and state because the end result will be a reduction of freedom for everyone to practice the faith of their own choosing. 

Copies of The Christian Past that Wasn't can be purchased at your favorite retailer, including my Amazon affiliate and Bookshop.org affiliate.

Comments

Popular Posts