Faithful Witnesses -- A Lectionary Reflection for Easter 2
Acts 5:27-32
Revelation 1:4-8
John 20:19-31
Faithful Witnesses
On the Sunday after Easter, everyone is
supposed to take a breath and get back to normalcy. The preacher might even take the weekend off
(I don’t, but some do). But, is this the
time to sit back and enjoy the ride? Or,
is Easter the beginning of something new and exciting. Should we not be attending to the work of
God?
The texts for this week suggest that the Resurrection inaugurates
a new age, where the people of God get ready to go out into the world. John’s Gospel reading even has its own Pentecost
message. Luke may have us wait a few
weeks, but John is ready to go. The
Lectionary itself pushes us forward with its readings drawn from the Book of
Acts – in place of the regular Hebrew Bible texts. In these readings from Acts we engage with
stories that detail transformative encounters that occur as the people of God
head out from Jerusalem taking with them the Good News of Jesus. The word that comes to us is that Jesus hasn’t
retreated to heaven so we can go back to life as usual. This isn’t the 1950s, when everyone was content
to forget the war years and embrace normalcy.
The first reading comes from Acts 5. Just prior to this excerpt, we learn that the
Jerusalem Church was experimenting with community of goods, an experiment
marred by the deceit of Ananias and Sapphira.
We will also find in the sections prior to this reading, the previous
arrest and imprisonment of Peter and John, who were delivered from their chains
by divine intervention. As we come to
this reading, Peter and John have again been arrested for preaching the message
of Jesus’ death and resurrection – contra the instructions of the ruling
council in Jerusalem. Although we only
get a snippet of the “trial” before the Council, we do hear Peter’s response to
the charge that the disciples were teaching things that made the Council
uncomfortable – charging them with complicity in the death of Jesus.
Peter’s response is direct and
powerful. It’s a response that is well
known to many Christians, but rarely imitated.
Peter tells the council that “we must obey God rather than humans!” It is clear that while Peter and John stand
before the religious leaders, they don’t recognize them as speaking for God. As a preacher I must take this as a reminder
that clerical status doesn’t determine whether a message is divinely inspired
or not. Peter and John tell their
judges that they must take their instructions from the Spirit of God, who compelled
them to bear witness to Jesus.
Now, we must be careful in our reading of this passage that
we don’t fall into the trap of blaming “the Jews” for the execution of
Jesus. While there were important
figures in the leadership that colluded with the Roman government – in part as
a way of protecting the religious privileges of the people – it is
inappropriate to tar the entire community with this stain. That being said, Luke does hold this group of
religious leaders responsible for Jesus’ death, and he makes it clear that their
guilt stems from their refusal to take responsibility for their collaboration
with the powers that be. As we read this
text, we must ask the question -- how often have we done the same? History shows that at least since the days of
Constantine, the church has often stood on the side of those who wield power at
the expense of the people. Whether or
not they agreed with Hitler’s desire to exterminate Jews, the majority of
German church leaders did nothing to stop him – nor did they encourage their
people to do anything. In an earlier era
the church was complicit in the near extermination of Native Americans in the
first decades following the European conquest of the region. There were a few who resisted – like
Bartolomé de Las Casas, but he wasn’t among the majority of church
leaders. Good Christian preachers not
only supported but gave religious sanction to slavery.
So where do we stand? To whom do we give our allegiance? There is one who stands out as a modern
martyr. Archbishop Oscar Romero came to
believe that as a bishop he needed to speak out against the oppression he saw occurring
in his country. He was accused of
entering the political realm, but he continually pointed to the prophetic texts
to support his engagement on behalf of those who were oppressed in his
country. Finally, he was assassinated as
he celebrated the Eucharist by members of the right wing death squads that were
connected to the government. In that era
similar groups were terrorizing Latin America -- – often with the support or at
least acquiescence of the American government – and when the church stood up to
these groups they suffered mightily.
So, as we hear this word as expressed by Peter, we face the question of
where we stand. Luther is famous for
standing up for his faith, declaring:
“Here I am, I can do no other.”
Peter said something similar, as did Oscar Romero, Martin Luther King,
and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. So, what are we
willing to say?
The next two readings come from
documents that traditionally have been attributed to the Apostle John – the one
who joined with Peter in that moment of confrontation. In the first reading – from Revelation -- we
hear a word from John of Patmos, who writes to the seven churches of Asia. We don’t know the full context, but the
church seems to be under duress. There
is a need to remain faithful to the gospel, but also an expectation that Jesus
will intervene in cataclysmic fashion. The
second reading comes from the Gospel of John, which speaks here of Jesus’ post
resurrection appearance to his now fearful disciples.
In the first reading, from
Revelation, John of Patmos (whether the apostle or someone else) speaks of a “revelation
of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take
place.” This is an apocalyptic
text. The expectation is that Jesus is
going to act soon to deliver the people of God from their situation of
duress. Again, we can only speculate
about what is happening (and we’ve been good at speculation). John notes that this message came to him by
way of an angel, “who bore witness to
the word of God and to the witness of
Jesus Christ.” It’s important to note
the use of the word witness.” Jesus sends the angel to John to bear
witness to Jesus, and in the course of the conversation, John and his followers
will be encouraged to take up their own witness. But we start with the one whom John calls the
“the faithful witness, the firstborn
among the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth.” This is the one who speaks and whose word his
followers will share in their own witness.
In this brief reading, the author invites us to honor the
faithful witness who “loves us and freed us from our sins by his blood.” Do you see in this an echo of the word given
in the Gospel of John, which speaks of God’s love of the world and the sending
of the son into the world? (John 3:16).
Because of what God has already done in Christ, we become part of a
kingdom and “priests to his God and Father.”
To this one “belongs glory and power forever.” He is the “Alpha and Omega.” To a community that is feeling lost and
alone, this is truly a word of encouragement.
The “Alpha and Omega” stands with you, enabling your witness. The moral of the story -- If Jesus is a
faithful witness, then should we not pick up the task ourselves? The witness began with Jesus, moved through
the angel to John, and from John to us, so that we can be faithful witnesses
ourselves – even in the face of great danger.
When it comes to the reading from
the Gospel of John, I’m intrigued by Lee Harmon’s suggestion that it comes from
the same hand as Revelation, and that the Gospel is really a reassessment of
John’s eschatological message. Harmon
thinks that Revelation was written in the decade following the Jewish War that
led to the destruction of Jerusalem. In
this earlier text there is an expectation that Jesus will return to set things
right. In the Gospel, however, John (the
Apostle) offers a new vision, one that expresses a “realized eschatology.” Instead of waiting for the kingdom, the
kingdom is already present. Jesus is
here in our midst! There is no impending catastrophic day of the
Lord. We just need to embrace the
kingdom now, and allow it to unfold in our midst. When it comes to our text for the week, Harmon
is convinced that the bulk of John 20, including the story of Doubting Thomas
is a later redaction of the Gospel that seeks to align its message more with
that of the Synoptics. I don’t have
space to engage this issue, but I do find an important word that connects us
with the messages in Acts and Revelation.
That word comes in the first scene, prior to the encounter with Thomas,
which I’m leaving to the side.
In verses 19-23 of John 20, the
disciples are hiding behind closed doors.
They’re afraid. Jesus has been
executed – and they might be next. We’ve
heard the reports of Jesus’ resurrection and appearance to Mary, but it would
seem that more is needed to convince the community that there is more work to
be done. So, on the evening of the Day
of Resurrection, Jesus comes and stands
with them. He just shows up – out of
nowhere, but in this passage he does show them his hands and side to prove that
he’s not a phantom (Thomas will demand more proof – wouldn’t you?). This encounter with the risen Christ fills
them with joy, but this is only the first step – reassurance. Next comes the Johannine equivalent of the
Great Commission plus the blessing of Pentecost (without the gift of
tongues). Jesus says to the gathered
community:
As the Father sent me, so I am sending you.” Then he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit” (John 20:21-22).
With this
the disciples receive both their commission to be faithful witnesses and the
empowerment to fulfill that calling. In
fact, they’re even given authority to forgive (or not forgive) sins.
God into the world – be witnesses. That is the calling of the body of
Christ. It is the message not only of
Pentecost, but Easter as well. The
Resurrected One has spoken.
Comments