Alternative Paths to Power? - Lectionary Reflection for Lent 1C
4 Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit in the wilderness, 2 where for forty days he was tempted by the devil. He ate nothing at all during those days, and when they were over, he was famished. 3 The devil said to him, “If you are the Son of God, command this stone to become a loaf of bread.” 4 Jesus answered him, “It is written, ‘One does not live by bread alone.’”
5 Then the devil led him up and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world. 6 And the devil said to him, “To you I will give their glory and all this authority; for it has been given over to me, and I give it to anyone I please. 7 If you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours.” 8 Jesus answered him, “It is written,
‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve only him.’”
9 Then the devil took him to Jerusalem, and placed him on the pinnacle of the temple, saying to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down from here, 10 for it is written,
‘He will command his angels concerning you, to protect you,’
11 and
‘On their hands they will bear you up,so that you will not dash your foot against a stone.’”
12 Jesus answered him, “It is said, ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’” 13 When the devil had finished every test, he departed from him until an opportune time.
***************
Jesus
was filled with the Spirit when he left the Jordan and headed into the
wilderness. Led by the Spirit, he spent forty days in the wilderness fasting
and praying. This time of fasting is the
basis of the forty days of Lent. Lent is traditionally a time when we give
something of value so as to better focus on the things of God. I doubt many of
us fast for forty days. Indeed, I expect that most of us, myself included,
haven’t given much attention to fasting at all. We may have even found the
tradition of giving something up for Lent to have little meaning, though I do
like the idea suggested by Pope Francis that during this Lenten season we give up indifference. That might actually make a difference in the lives of people.
I
titled this reflection “alternative paths to power.” That is because each of
the tests proposed by the devil offers a path to power that differs markedly
from the one envisioned by God. Without giving into binaries, Jesus is given the
choice between taking up a ministry led and empowered by the Holy Spirit or
follow the way of the Tempter. In contrast to the Spirit, the Tempter offers
shortcuts to power, things like idolatry and spectacle. Since this is a
political season we may recognize some of these shortcuts. It’s human to find a
quicker way to success. Give the people what they want. Tickle their fancy.
Hope they don’t see through the mirage. The way of the Spirit is different.
It’s the long road, but in the end, it’s the road that forms us as people of
God.
When we
think of the wilderness in a biblical sense, the best image is the Sinai, where
the people of God wandered for forty years. It shouldn’t have taken forty
years. The road from Egypt to Canaan takes a few weeks at most, but it appears
that it took forty years before they were ready to cross the river. They
needed time to be formed as a people. They needed to learn to trust in God.
They needed to understand where power derived.
We
begin the season of Lent each year with this story. We’re asked to envision
what it’s like to fast forty days. Since most of us struggle to give up a meal
or two, the thought that he might be famished at the end of this ordeal isn’t
difficult to conceive. Not only is he hungry from going without food (and
drink?), but he’s spent much of the time battling the devil. Similar kinds of
stories were told by the “Desert Fathers,” those ascetic masters that emerged in
the third and fourth centuries. Following the example of Jesus, they would go
out into the desert where they would spend their lives fasting and praying.
Many Christians would seek out these spiritual masters hoping to receive wisdom
for their own lives. Many of the “Desert Fathers” reported battles with demons
and with the devil. Perhaps the most famous of these desert masters was St.
Anthony, an Egyptian monastic, whose story was told by St. Athanasius.
But the devil, who hates and envies what is good, could not endure to see such a resolution in a youth, but endeavoured to carry out against him what he had been wont to effect against others. First of all, he tried to lead him away from the discipline, whispering to him the remembrance of his wealth, care for his sister, claims of kindred, love of money, love of glory, the various pleasures of the table and the other relaxations of life, and at last the difficulty of virtue and the labour of it; he suggested also the infirmity of the body and the length of the time. In a word he raised in his mind a great dust of debate, wishing to debar him from his settled purpose. [Life of St. Antony].
The devil tried to get Anthony to take an alternate path but to no avail. He remained true to his calling, living as he did in the
Spirit.
The
tests here have to do with Jesus’ calling. At his baptism, he was commissioned
by God. “You are my Son, the Beloved.” The argument is that there are easier
paths to achieving power than the one Jesus is setting out on. It is a constant
temptation for the people of God to take shortcuts. Consider the temptation
that constantly faces the Christian community in a place like the United
States. If only we can partner with the powers that be, then we can achieve our
goals. We can create a “more moral society” if only we can get the government
to follow our lead. Let’s proclaim the nation to be Christian. Then things will
go as we wish! The problem is that more often than not when the church gets
itself too entangled with the state, the realm of God simply becomes an
extension of the reigning powers. That was the case with Christendom, and we’re
still living with its aftereffects.
Miroslav Volf talks about the
thinning of religion. This happens when the moral vision of a religion is
reduced to a “vague religiosity” that is shaped by forces other than that
religion itself. The thinning occurs when religions “identify too closely with
a given community and the dynamics of power; and such ‘thin’ religions are most
susceptible to being used as merely a political and cultural resource, and
occasionally even as a weapon of war” (Volf, Flourishing, p. 189]. That doesn’t mean there’s no room for public
engagement, but the temptations presented to Jesus suggest complete
entanglement. Take the shortcuts. Let the state impose your “values” on the
populace.
It’s not easy to say no to power.
It’s not easy saying no to one’s own needs. We who serve in the church know
this all too well. With a family to support, it’s easy for preachers to tell
people what they want to hear. That’s why the purveyors of the prosperity
gospel are so successful. They tell us that God wants us to be rich. God wants
us to be successful. God wants us to be powerful. Just believe and it will
occur (oh, and by the way, be sure to send a check to this “ministry” so we can
be rich and powerful).
Luke tells of three tests. One has
to do with resolving Jesus’ hunger. The second has to do with idolatry (in our
case that could be giving ultimate allegiance to the state or to the
culture—American exceptionalism, Manifest Destiny, or the cult of
Judeo-Christian America). The third has to do with spectacle (jump off the
pinnacle of the Temple). Each time Jesus, filled with the Spirit, says no to
the temptation. He remains true to his calling. He continues to walk in the
Spirit. Finally, the tempter gives up and lives him alone, at least for now. Luke suggests that the Tempter will look for
another more opportune time? Testing comes and goes and comes again. The path
to this point was difficult, and it will continue to have its difficulties, but
Jesus continues in the Spirit. Therefore, he invites us to do the same. There
are alternate paths to power. Jesus invites to walk in the Spirit, and follow
his example!
Comments