Doubt and the Journey of Faith

I have been mulling over the role of doubt in our faith journey in a couple of posts, and want to continue that conversation. The importance of considering the role of doubt relates to the issue of certainty and how certainty of a position can hinder dialogue and conversation.

I've noted that John Calvin pointed out that doubt is a reality and that we need to accept it as we live out our faith in God. Now, it's not that Calvin was quavering in his doubt, but he understood its reality. I want to add another quote to the discussion. This one comes from Lutheran theologian Ted Peters, who writes in his systematic theology God -- the World's Future (Fortress, 1992):

Doubt sounds like a negative principle. It is. Yet over time it has led to a positive principle, namely, commitment to pluralism. If one can always doubt one's own position, then one must grant the possible truth of an opponent's position. Nevertheless, as soon as this is done, the opponent ceases to be an opponent and becomes a fellow traveler along the path that takes us toward greater and greater uncertainty about everything except pluralism itself.

He goes on to talk about Descartes's view of doubt/thinking, and the reality that it's no longer possible to prove with certainty anything regarding God. But then, what is faith, except acting on something unseen and unprovable.

As Hebrews puts it:

"Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen" (Hebrews 11:1)


I am confident in my beliefs. I confess boldly that Jesus is the Christ and the Son of the Living God (Matthew 16:16), but like Peter I may not completely understand what that confession means. And to say with certainty that I am correct and that anyone who makes a different confession is with certainty wrong, should be seen as the height of arrogance. But if I live out my faith in Jesus by trying to live as he would have me live -- as shown both in his life and in his teachings -- then am I not faithful? Ultimately, this is a judgment that God alone can make.

It is more often than not a sense of certainty that leads to violence -- it can be a certainty of religious dimensions or secular ones, but when we believe that we alone are right, then before long we begin to justify acts of violence against the other. But when we step back and recognize that the other could be correct in their beliefs, then we will step back from violence.

Comments

John said…
God speaks perfectly but I hear imperfectly. God speaks to me in a language and using cultural symbols which I can hear and understand, though sometimes not as good as God would like.

I also think God communicates with everyone else in a language and using ideas and cultural symbols which make sense to those people if they will listen.

There is no reason to think that I would understand and respond to the language and symbols with which God communicates with others.

So, while I think I know God, I have to admit that I do not know how God presents Godself to others - to make such a claim would be tantamount to claiming to fully know God or to deny God the ability to communicate uniquely with each person. If God is my creator, and my redeemer God is their's as well - and in a unique way for each of us. This understanding seems to me to be especially consistent with those who claim a personal relationship with Jesus.

So, doubt aside, common sense compels me to admit that I only know so much of God as God communicates to me, and further to admit that I know very little about God as God communicates Godself to others - i.e., God is both pluralistic and a particularistic.

John
Anonymous said…
There are two issues that seem to be going on here. Are there doubts around God? Of course. Any serious Christian would say they experienced doubts at some point. Its often the questions that doubt arises that lead to the digging deeper into Christ.

That said.. I don't think the fact I may have a time of doubt means that it invalidates Christ's teachings or lifts up another religion or god. As the verse you quotes says..we have assurance and conviction.. it means to suggest another route is fine shows neither assurance in my faith nor any conviction. My conviction fails b/c I had a period of doubt.

Can the idea of pluralism be supported Biblically? I have never heard the defense, but honestly curious. My take away has been Christ is pretty bold in this manner.. "I am the only way".

-Chuck
John said…
My take is also that Christ is the only way. There is only one God. It is just that I think that Christ works in may different ways to reach different people.

I think that Christ loves all of God's children and has planned for the salvation of all. And however, we get there, it is the work of Christ that makes it happen.

John
John said…
I can point to Isaiah 56, but that is an OT cite and it is not all that clear.

On a very personal level, in my compassion, I hope and pray for the salvation of all people. Should I imagine that God is any less compassionate or that God desires anything less for my neighbors than I think he wants for me?

I know that God is more compassionate than I, more loving, more involved in the lives of my neighbors, and more desirous of their salvation than I. And God's ability to find a way to guide each of us home is unlimited.

And God is not bound to deliver my neighbor to salvation in the same manner that God saves me.

John

So

Popular Posts