Dogmatic Definitions!
In a previous posting I noted how Philip Clayton spoke of not making use of the "dogma card." That has led to some conversation -- so I thought I'd post a theological dictionary definition.
Gerald O'Collins writes in the entry on Dogma in The Westminster Dictionary of Theology."
But, O'Collins notes that what are known as dogmas are those doctrinal formulations that emerged after the apostolic age -- essentially in the period of Nicea (325 CE) and following. Thus, doctrines like the Trinity, the Two Natures of Christ, etc. He comments that "dogmas cannot and should not be treated as ultimate norms." That being said, the way the word is more popularly used is as I believe Philip Clayton used it -- that discussion ending statement.
Now, one can believe strongly and confidently, but at the same time remember that our interpretations and theological formulations are not infallible.
Gerald O'Collins writes in the entry on Dogma in The Westminster Dictionary of Theology."
After a chequered history, by the end of the nineteenth century the word came to bear the precise meaning of (i) a divinely revealed truth, (ii) proclaimed as such by solemn church teaching (for Roman Catholics by the infallible authority of the magisterium), and (iii) hence binding now and forever on the faithful. (S.V. "Dogma," The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Theology, Westminster Press, 1983).
But, O'Collins notes that what are known as dogmas are those doctrinal formulations that emerged after the apostolic age -- essentially in the period of Nicea (325 CE) and following. Thus, doctrines like the Trinity, the Two Natures of Christ, etc. He comments that "dogmas cannot and should not be treated as ultimate norms." That being said, the way the word is more popularly used is as I believe Philip Clayton used it -- that discussion ending statement.
Now, one can believe strongly and confidently, but at the same time remember that our interpretations and theological formulations are not infallible.
Comments