“Surprised!” is the rarest response of almost everyone to the long-awaited papal document on the joy of love (
Amoris Laetitia). So devotedly had Pope Francis and Catholic episcopal leadership pondered and worked on the new 256-page document on the family and marriage (etc.) that the resulting product was predictable.
Why? Because the positions with which it had to deal had been so widely discussed and because parties with interests had already foreseen favored vs. unfavored outcomes, there was little wiggle room left for the authors if they had wanted to surprise anyone. Our earlier reference to “almost everyone responding” includes the Catholic left and right, progressives and traditionalists, dogmatists and pastors, “ordinary” Catholic lay people, other religious people, and the larger public, which has much at stake in the views and practices of the world’s largest communion.
It was no surprise that the church leadership took on domestic and personal issues. Had the document dealt with classic Catholic dogmatic interests—say, on the Trinity, the Incarnation, transubstantiation, and more, the interest would have been relatively low. Not that everything fought over for centuries has been creatively addressed and resolved. Rather, what long represented life-and-death, heaven-and-hell doctrinal issues have become eclipsed by those which deal with sexual practices and personal problems.
What might have occasioned some surprise? Had Pope Francis been ready to please the hard-line dogmatists and thus thereby disappointed, angered, alienated, or lost the majority of Catholics by taking a severe line on the issues being addressed, this personalizing pontiff would have prompted reactive surprise. Had the document instead been designed and intended to please only those who wanted a fresh address to divorce, homosexuality, or same-sex marriage, and thus “gone all the way” in assenting to what “progressives” want, the Pope and the bishops would have set themselves up for revolution from the conservatives.
So
Amoris Laetitia was true to what Vatican observers had seen in the Pope and leaders favorable to him, which is pastoral care, empathy, and concern for some (not all) the sets of Catholics who suffer under current strictures. The word “Divorce” appeared in most headlines.
There is no way that the document could have said that for centuries the church had been simply wrong for opposing divorce. But it could and did show that leaders had seen the pain and strain felt by divorced and remarried Catholics who lived on in marriage after un-annuled broken marriages and who readily approached their Lord’s Table at the mass.
The document does not say that “anything goes,” but the Pope made clear that, rather than censure all with acts which barred them from the sacred rites, he expected that careful pastoral approaches and an appeal to informed consciences would best serve the souls of the faithful.
So there is here no new Catholic doctrine on divorce and remarriage. On other issues, predictably, he did not please LGBT Catholics, who had argued eloquently for change but were rebuffed. In too many regions and parts of the Church the abhorrence of homosexual activity is so profound that in some cases it even supports the death penalty for those who engage in same-sex activities.
Amoris Laetitia pays little positive pastoral attention to those who would enter same-sex marriages. Supporting abortion? No chance.
The nearest the document comes to surprising readers in its continuing monitoring of the bedroom is its renewed condemnation of “birth control.” That all surveys and observations suggest that millions of otherwise faithful Catholics will shrug off renewed church law and simply by-pass church disciplines means that “informed consciences” may have to look elsewhere for any “informing” that squares with their experience, reflection, intentions, and their own studied and conscientious dissent.
Pope Francis went as far as he could to address the concerns of the faithful, but the years ahead will see anything but resolution, assent, or cheer among many diverse conscientious Catholic populations. This may be the wrong century in which to look for such. He tried.
Resources:
Carroll, James. “
The New Morality of Pope Francis.”
New Yorker, April 8, 2016, News.
Yardley, Jim and Laurie Goodstein. “
Francis’ Message Calls on Church to Be Inclusive.”
New York Times, April 8, 2015, Europe.
“
Pope’s Family Document ‘Amoris Laetita’ tackles Complex Pastoral Challenges.”
National Catholic Register, April 8, 2016, Daily News.
Rocca, Francis X. “
The Pope and the Divorce Question.”
Wall Street Journal, Sept. 25, 2014, Houses of Worship.
Rocca, Francis X. “
Pope Francis Opens New Phase in Church’s Debate on Divorce.”
Wall Street Journal, April 8, 2016, World.
Weigel, George. “
Pope Francis on Love, Marriage, and the Family.”
National Review, April 8, 2016.
Staff Reporter. “
Amoris Laetitia: Five key passages you need to read.”
Catholic Herald, April 8, 2016, Comment & Blogs.
Greene, Richard Allen. “
Pope to church: Be more accepting of divorced Catholics, gays and lesbians.”
CNN, April 8, 2016, World.
“
Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation on the Joy of Love: Summary of Amoris Laetita.”
Vatican Radio, April 8, 2016, Pope Francis \ Documents.
To read the entire text of Pope Francis’
Amoris Laetitia, visit the Vatican’s website: “
Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia of the Holy Father Francis to Bishops, Priests and Deacons, Consecrated Persons, Christian Married Couples, and all the Lay Faithful on Love in the Family.” Accessed April 11, 2016.
Image: Pope Francis greets pilgrims during his weekly general audience in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican (Jan. 15, 2014); Credit: Giulio Napolitano / Shutterstock.com creative commons.
Comments